User talk:SpooksBGone

Welcome![edit]

Hi SpooksBGone! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ZombiUwU ^{(💬 ~♥~ 📝)} 02:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 12:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SpooksBGone (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I hope you have accepted my apology about this fake Grandson, Jstars780. My mistake but I am here to build an encyclopedia by making this page about my Uncle better illustrated. SpooksBGone (talk) 16:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This makes no sense whatsoever. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SpooksBGone (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please read here on Commons for more info about my appeal, to make better sense and show I am here to build an encyclopedia. The image I was blocked for adding has been approved now and all I want to do is add it as Doug Weller promised I could. [1] SpooksBGone (talk) 08:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked, in part, for posting a threat to an editor. Nothing you have written since then addresses that fact. JBW (talk) 22:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I can do that myself. But your user page, which I deleted, suggests that you were here just for the photo and to attack an editor for some reason.. Doug Weller talk 08:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you didn't actually attack the editor, you threatened them:"We are coming for you". Doug Weller talk 09:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was coming to replace that picture and figure out why the original was deleted but if you would be so kind to do that for me, I'd be very grateful. I'll delete my user page if unblocked. SpooksBGone (talk) 11:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already deleted. That's not the problem The problem is the threat with the off Wiki link. That needs explanation. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I originally thought that Zelenko was responsible for deleting the image and part of Wikipediametric. It turns out it was an account called JStars780 pretending to be my family, who appears linked to Pakistani intelligence instead. I've issued apologies to Doug Weller and Zelenko on this matter. SpooksBGone (talk) 11:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's guideline on conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, SpooksBGone. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. JBW (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine JBW. I understand. Doug's made the edit required and had no conflict of interest himself when doing it. God bless him. The spooks are gone. SpooksBGone (talk) 12:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]