User talk:Srlbraintree
Help
[edit]![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I made a page for Bill Walczak which someone subsequently flagged as potentially not meeting the guidelines for a notable individual. So I've added some more primatry sources. Am I -- it the page -- OK now?
Thanks!
Srlbraintree (talk) 15:55, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Politicians, especially Note #3. As an unelected candidate, Wikipedia doesn't recognise independent notability for him, from what is currently included in the article, as a candidate or any other individual achievement. It might be possible to reorganise the article to one about the Boston mayoral election, which should mention all declared and declined candidates equally. Dru of Id (talk) 16:16, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Srlbraintree, as you may have seen from the Articles for deletion discussion, Bill Walczak may possibly meet Wikipedia's general notability criteria. Dru of Id was quite correct that, as of last week, the article looked like it was simply written to raise the profile of a non-notable local politician. However, coverage about Walczak's past (non-politics) activities may demonstrate he is widely known over a much longer period. I see you've been adding some additional news sources about his activities, so you are obviously on the right track. Good luck!
- The AfD will normally run for at least 7 days, after which time an admin will decide whether the article should be kept or deleted. Sionk (talk) 09:05, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Srlbraintree. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Start a discussion with Srlbraintree
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with Srlbraintree. What you say here will be public for others to see.