User talk:Sshamm01

This is Sshamm01's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jasem Mohamed Albudaiwi (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grabup was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More reliable independent sources needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jasem Mohamed Albudaiwi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Grabup (talk) 09:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sshamm01! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Grabup (talk) 09:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Sorry this is a joke right? Not enough reliable sources? The official news agency of several countries and the official website of the Gulf Cooperation Council? I have seen smaller wikipedia pages get approved and are online with much less sources. I am pretty sure if this was a "Western" organization like the European Union or NATO it would be considered fine and could be duly edited. The guy is all over the news and even has an Arabic page.

Please reconsider since this is clearly a double standard and this person and the sources are reputable especially given the small size of the page. 37.39.175.136 (talk) 09:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sshamm01, I am not from any Western countries, nor do I have any relation or bias towards them. The sources cited are found to be unreliable, with no in-depth coverage. Please cite more independent, reliable sources with in-depth coverage of the subject, and then resubmit the draft. Grabup (talk) 15:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First, thanks for answering and taking the time to respond.

But sorry. What does that even mean? I cannot seem to get a consistent answer, nor can anyone explain why / how an article from a reputable news site is considered unreliable when posting this kind of content? How is the website of the GCC considered unreliable? It is a well established organization that even has its own GCC page. This page isn't meant to be groundbreaking but aggregate some information about the SG on Wikipedia. He has an Arabic page.

What does independent have to do with basic facts--he is the SG I am not using the GCC website to make conjectures about him it is to list basic facts literally his CV.

What would you suggest I find to replace that -- the sources in English are not wide? Do you need a EU website? Since it seems EU officials can use the EU website as a source but not an Arab one?

The official Kuwait embassy page explaining his post? How is that unreliable?

How is it not in-depth? Do you need a biography of the person in print form? I see many other wikipedia articles with far less information making it through.

If you say it is unreliable -- which I completely disagree, could you please provide an example of a "reliable" source when it comes to this information please.

Thank you again. Sshamm01 (talk) 15:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sshamm01, Read WP:RS, these sources which you are talking about are primary sources. But to establish notability we need in-depth covarage from multiple independent secondary sources which are not connected with the subject. Read WP:GNG, primary sources can be used but it does not establish notability at all. Grabup (talk) 16:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the full list of reliable and unreliable sources. Grabup (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 12:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had no idea I was logged out I clicked a link in my email to reply and I made no edits I have just been asking questions on the Teahouse Sshamm01 (talk) 12:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nabeela Abdulla Al Mulla (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Charsaddian was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nabeela Abdulla Al Mulla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Charsaddian (talk) 11:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jasem Mohamed Albudaiwi

Hello, Sshamm01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jasem Mohamed Albudaiwi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:11, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]