User talk:Stacey Bright

Welcome!

Hello, Stacey Bright, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sine dicendo, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WNYY98 (talk) 03:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sine dicendo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sine dicendo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WNYY98 (talk) 03:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiktionary

Hi Stacey, for one- or two-line definitions such as Sine dicendo, Wiktionary is a better option. It is a sister project of Wikipedia, and you can link to it from Wikipedia. utcursch | talk 03:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sine dicendo

The article Sine dicendo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced; no indication that this topic has sufficient secondary source coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brianga (talk) 04:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sine dicendo

Hi Stacey. Thank you for contributing the sine dicendo article to Wikipedia. I removed the speedy deletion tag-- it didn't qualify under that criteria. Your contribution to Wikipedia is important, and we appreciate them. I have tagged the article for not having any sources. Wikipedia is based upon solid WP:reliable sources and adding them to the article would make it more useful to readers who might be using it for academic research and also help to make Wikipedia more trustworthy. Again, thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia :) TonyBallioni (talk) 04:10, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]