User talk:Stallreader

May 2014

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Miccoli (band). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Lixxx235 (talk) 00:24, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stallreader, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Lixxx235 (talk) 00:25, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Miccoli (band). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 12:12, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing. Lixxx235 (talk) 15:05, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Miccoli (band). You are simply not allowed to remove AfD templates from pages with a currently open AfD. Lixxx235 (talk) 15:41, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —SMALL JIM 16:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Qbucrs, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Thanks, Lixxx235^{Got a complaint?} 15:38, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing (most of your editing has consisted of removing maintenance tags and repeatedly removing an "articles for deletion" notice from an article), and for abuse of multiple accounts. From the character of your editing, it looks very much as though this is a sockpuppet account created by an editor with other accounts, but in the much less likely event that it is run by a different person, it is certainly a meatpuppet account, run by someone recruited by another editor to give a misleading appearance of independent support for that editor. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:27, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]