User talk:Steve406sbc

Ralek Gracie

Very possible, he speaks perfect English at least. I don't really know much about him, but I'm trying to find sources etc.. If you think something is wrong on the page, please go ahead and fix it :) aktsu (talk) 09:18, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Brock Lesnar Fighting.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Brock Lesnar Fighting.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Caol Uno.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Caol Uno.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Peripitus (Talk) 10:36, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:Caol Uno.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Caol Uno.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --aktsu ^(t / c) 10:53, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009

The recent edit you made has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You can't take screenshots from the broadcasts and upload them. --aktsu ^(t / c) 10:54, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:Kimbo Slice Sliced.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Kimbo Slice Sliced.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --aktsu ^(t / c) 11:24, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 11:40, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Susan Denberg.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Susan Denberg.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

October 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Richard Nixon, you may be blocked from editing. pbp 23:24, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. I see many contributions of questionable constructiveness from this account since your previous block, and the blatant misinformation at Richard Nixon was completely inappropriate. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu ^t/_c 00:38, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Steve406sbc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This was a mistake on my part, and was not done with malicious intent. At the time of editing that information I was truly of the belief that he was in fact the 38th president. Prior to the edit I had just finished up doing some reading/research on him as well as a few of the presidents preceding and succeeding him, and somehow came to believe he was the 38th president. Even up until today I was still of that belief. After becoming aware of this block just today, believing that a Wikipedia moderator had likely made a mistake in blocking me, I went back and took a more scrutinous look at presidential chronology, and it wasn't until then that I realized that my belief had been incorrect. I'm not one hundred percent certain as to how I ever came to that conclusion, but I'm guessing that it was a result of me somehow confusing vice presidential chronology with presidential chronology, perhaps misreading Lyndon Johnson's being the 37th "vice president" as him being the 37th "actual president." It's been awhile since the day I was reading up on the presidents from that era and made that edit, so again I'm not one hundred percent certain as to what led to my misbelief, but that edit was certainly not done out of malice or mischief. It was an innocent mistake. And regarding the moderator's accompanying note ("I see many contributions of questionable constructiveness from this account since your previous block, and the blatant misinformation at Richard Nixon was completely inappropriate.") I'm not certain as to what they're refering to when they say they see "many contributions of 'questionalbe' constructiveness." I wouldn't mind a little bit more specificity on that assertion. Also, I'm not sure that "completely inappropriate" is the most accurate way of describing the act of a person making a mistake regarding historical data.Steve406sbc (talk) 23:34, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Accept reason:

After a little consideration, I see no reason that I shouldn't unblock this account. The original report at WP:AIV was here. It is highly likely that I misread the date/year of the previous block, which led me to presume that you had few if any edits in the interim. While I might have found something to support the original reporter's claim of "[h]istory of ... factual errors" at the time, I don't see anything substantive, at least not since your previous block. Thank you for posting this unblock request, and to User:Anthony Bradbury for alerting me. I will assume good faith that your indication that this particular instance was a mistake rather than an attempt to disrupt the encyclopedia; I will ask that you please fact-check yourself more thoroughly in the future, though. :) Happy editing. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:48, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

I have contacted the blocking admin. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 13:14, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Richard Nixon talk page notice

I have added a section on the talk page for the article Richard Nixon titled "Section deleted on 13 December 2012." Please share your thoughts on the talk page. Thanks. Mitchumch (talk) 17:31, 16 December 2012 (UTC)