User talk:StivMello

Welcome![edit]

Hello, StivMello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Endri Fuga‎ did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! EasyAsPai (talk) 16:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Endri Fuga, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please stop making these changes without adding sources. EasyAsPai (talk) 17:20, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the warm welcome and for bringing your concerns to my attention. I appreciate your dedication to maintaining the verifiability and reliability of Wikipedia articles.

I apologize for any oversight in my recent edits. I understand the importance of citing reliable sources and adhering to Wikipedia's policies. I will review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and ensure that I provide proper references for any information I add or modify.

Thank you for your guidance, and I look forward to collaborating effectively on Wikipedia. StivMello (talk) 14:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ervin Demo (March 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Demo is notable but this needs to be rewritten in a neutral manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ervin Demo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 15:59, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, StivMello! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 15:59, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ervin Demo has been accepted[edit]

Ervin Demo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 22:54, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

You uploaded the image for Ervin Demo as "own work" which indicates you know the subject of the article. Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the appropriate disclosure if applicable. CNMall41 (talk) 22:57, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, CNMall41. StivMello, you need to address the likely conflict of interest. I am going to leave a template below with some links. It is imperative that you follow those and acquaint yourself with our guidelines and policies, and disclosure is the first step. Also, you moved it back to main space without addressing any of the problems (notability, lack of secondary sourcing). I am going to move it back: please do NOT move it again without improving the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 20:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, StivMello. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Ervin Demo, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 20:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]