User talk:Strife82

Your changes to Cradle of Filth pages

Please do not change Cradle of Filth's genre on any page, a lot of discussion has gone into deciding what genre they are, and we have done the best we can to come to an agreement. One thing is for sure, they are not Black Metal. For more information see the talk page on the Cradle of Filth article. The Haunted Angel 00:46, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wotcha. And another thing... Thanks for your contributions, but be very careful to keep what you write NPOV - check the rules and the discussion pages if you're unsure. Album reviews are necessarily subjective, and therefore don't belong in an encyclopaedia. Also, think about what you're writing. It is absolutely ludicrous to say that Dani Filth has ever written lyrics in Old English. Here's a passage of Old English (from Beowulf):

Hwæt! We Gardena in geardagum,

þeodcyninga, þrym gefrunon, hu ða æþelingas ellen fremedon. Oft Scyld Scefing sceaþena þreatum, monegum mægþum, meodosetla ofteah, egsode eorlas. Syððan ærest wearð feasceaft funden, he þæs frofre gebad, weox under wolcnum, weorðmyndum þah, oðþæt him æghwylc þara ymbsittendra ofer hronrade hyran scolde, gomban gyldan.

See what I mean? Cardinal Wurzel 14:01, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More Cradle changes...

Again dude, you are changing the genre of Cradle of Filth albums. Do not do this, lest you be banned. A lot of discussion has gone into this, and we are not going to let someone who thinks that he knows what they are swoop in and just change it to his liking. How you can even change Nymphetamine and Damnation to BM is beyond me, but I am asking you to stop and leave the genre as it is. This is the second I have had to ask you, and if you persist, I will have you banned. If you disagree with the genre, please mention it at the relevant discussion, rather then mindlessly changing their genre relentlessly. At least reply to the messages if you think it should be Black Metal, as opposed to just ignoring them. Thanks - The Haunted Angel 09:37, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

THINK!

Okay, so first Dani was writing lyrics in Old English, and now the whole band are wearing medieval costumes on the Cruelty sleeve... He wasn't. They're not. Cardinal Wurzel 09:58, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to List of enemies in Doom

I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. --Drat (Talk) 09:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be ignorant!

Please do not change the Cradle of Filth Genre on any of their albums without first Discussing it!!. A lot of work has gone into this, and if you continue to change the Cradle of Filth genre as you have been doing for so long, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Consider this your warning and please respond when messages are placed on your talk page, so we can at least talk out this dispute. Thanks ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 00:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be Ignorant, part 2...

Please stop changing Cradle's genre. Seriously, I will revert any and every such edit you make unless you discuss it properly on the main talk page. ≈ The Haunted Angel 00:45, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Thornography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. magnius (talk) 00:28, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

THINK! again

Cruelty and the Beast was "the last album to feature a heavily symphonic sound"? Despite, for example, Damnation and a Day having a hundred-piece symphony orchestra on it? Cardinal Wurzel (talk) 10:33, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Three Stooges Quotes

Hi. I have noticed the quotes you have added to many of the articles for Three Stooges films. While the more memorable quotes are fine, there are far too many quotes that do not add to the article. In particular are quotes from routines that are more visual in nature. Please choose the quote additions more carefully and do not overdo it. Thanx!Oanabay04 (talk) 17:15, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did by reverting edits to No Census, No Feeling, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Oanabay04 (talk) 20:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Dark requiems...

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Dark requiems.... First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Dark Requiems.... Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Dark Requiems... - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. demize (t · c) 20:54, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From Afar

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to From Afar, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Backtable _{Speak to me}^{concerning my deeds.} 18:27, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

01011001

Please refrain from changing genre formats, as you did to 01011001, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes and genre format changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Backtable ^{Speak to me}_{concerning my deeds.} 00:53, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. When you recently edited Turisas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arkona (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Century Media Records artists (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Massacre (band), Tenet, The Gathering and Into Eternity

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:52, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Ecco the Dolphin, you may be blocked from editing. -Thibbs (talk) 22:46, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spinefarm Records, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dragonlord (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:20, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Impaled Nazarene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catamenia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eremita, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extreme (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

After (Ihsahn album)

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to After (Ihsahn album), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Such genre changing counters what Wikipedia stands for. Thank you. Mungo Kitsch 23:50, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

February 2012

Please stop. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at 01011001, you may be blocked from editing. You have been warned against this behavior for years, yet you continue to engage in it. Why is that? Mungo Kitsch (talk) 21:56, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vae victis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defiance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Dead Heart in a Dead World, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 22:49, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Above (Samael album), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 04:55, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Strife82. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Till fjälls: Del II

The article Till fjälls: Del II has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable bandcamp album

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jennica✿ / ^talk 03:36, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Strife82. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Strife82. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Stunt Dawgs, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Kids shows don't have the F word. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:47, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Me Too movement. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I shouldn't have to say why this wasn't a neutral contribution, and why it would likely be regarded as vandalism. Symmachus Auxiliarus (talk) 22:27, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]