User talk:StrokeSwift

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, StrokeSwift. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! MPS1992 (talk) 12:52, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello, I'm Muboshgu. Your recent edit to the page A. J. Pollock appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:00, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Poe Dameron, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:09, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Turning Point USA, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Everything you deleted had a source - if you have an issue with the article's sourcing, bring it up on the article talk page. KNHaw ^(talk) 19:45, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 19:57, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Turning Point USA and my talk page

I believe you are confused about who edited what on Turning Point USA. The edit I reverted was here. It had nothing to do with Kirk (whomever that is) nor did it cite The Daily Beast. What the edit I reverted *did* was remove a well sourced (CBS News) allegation of racist behavior. Your edit also used a seething, unprofessional comment in the edit that made it clear you were attempting to censor the content. Perhaps you are confusing me with @Grayfell: who reverted this edit of yours that also had an editorializing comment but cited both the Daily Beast and Business Insider.

If you have a problem with the CBS News source, fine - bring it up in the article talk page as I suggested. Perhaps the other editors there can suggest other sources you can cite and to include in a defense Turning Point and explain why CBS News is incorrect. That would add to the article but would not be seen as attempts at censoring as your previous edits appear to be.

Final note - this is not an attempt to start a debate with you, argue with you, or engage with you in any way. I have no interest in challenging your views, changing your views, hearing your views or, frankly, ever having any contact with you in the future. If you feel I have made a personal attack on you or have engaged in otherwise incorrect behavior, please see the guidelines on reporting harassment at Wikipedia:AOHA. I will be deleting your comment on my talk page and ask you to please do not ever, ever leave a comment on my talk page again. Feel free to delete this comment after you have read it as well - that is perfectly reasonable. In the future I will never leave a comment on your talk page either - it's only fair.

Best of luck with your editing - --KNHaw ^(talk) 21:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]