User talk:SuperWriter23

Welcome!

Hi SuperWriter23! I noticed your contributions to Dhruv Tara – Samay Sadi Se Pare and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Gaismagorm (talk) 16:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Banda12345. Thank you. Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk) 19:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block Review

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SuperWriter23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here -- My account has been blocked for wrong paid promotion or advertising but I didn't did any paid promotion and it is true because if you had done paid promotion, you can't deny it as a rule. I didn't done any paid promotion or advertising. The reason for which I have been blocked is completely wrong and a case of misunderstanding

Decline reason:

What a bizarre claim. People deny doing paid promotion all the time when they definitely did. Nor does this address your violations of WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 11:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Another review

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SuperWriter23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here ~~ I swear, I didn't did any paid promotion. How can I do paid promotion, I mean am just a new comer to editing. I don't know anyone. If you don't trust me, then tell me how to prove myself. You tell me who would bother if he had done paid promotion for a block, afterall he had money. But I swear, I had done nothing wrong and also I have no connection with the accounts who are told to be connected by me. I am telling the truth. Please help me. No one is trusting me.SuperWriter23 (talk) 12:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

People also deny connections to other accounts and ask us to trust them all the time; if just denial was sufficient to get unblocked, the sockpuppetry policy would be meaningless. Please speak to the evidence offered in the SPI, specifically why you made the same edit that a blocked user tried to make. 331dot (talk) 14:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Response for previous review

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SuperWriter23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand your policies but you can tell me what can I do to prove myself in case I am actually right. SuperWriter23 (talk) 14:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request, and I have no idea what you're talking about. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:14, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I already did that above- please tell why you made the same edit as a blocked user if you have nothing to do with them. 331dot (talk) 08:26, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because I found the user had made right edits but unfortunately it was blocked so I thought that I should make that correct edits which were needed in that article because it contained wrong information about the original content and some technical edits such as translation names, places names and time leaps. SuperWriter23 (talk) 10:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SuperWriter23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here SuperWriter23 (talk) 09:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Because I found the user had made right edits but unfortunately it was blocked so I thought that I should make that correct edits which were needed in that article because it contained wrong information about the original content and some technical edits such as translation names, places names and time leaps.[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. ONE open unblock request at a time, please. If you don't like your open unblock request, remove it or reword it. It's abusive to open multiple simultaneous unblock requests. Yamla (talk) 10:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reply to Yamla

OK. Thanks for letting me know. I wasn't aware of it. SuperWriter23 (talk) 10:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are also not permitted to remove (or edit) declined unblock requests for your currently active block. --Yamla (talk) 10:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I will keep it in mind. SuperWriter23 (talk) 11:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]