User talk:Supernotgood

November 2020

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Pink Floyd, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Laser brain (talk) 13:45, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia catagorizes All of pink floyds early albums as being space rock, so I dont see whats wrong with the edit. Supernotgood (talk) 11:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not alter genres on album or song articles without providing a reliable source. --Laser brain (talk) 15:18, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Hormoaning, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Laser Brain has asked you not to add unsourced genres and now I am too! Rob van vee 10:08, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Carp, you may be blocked from editing. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You have now multiple times altered genres on King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard album pages, specifically Nonagon Infinity and L.W. with no cited sources. As mentioned above, changing genres based on personal opinion alone constitutes disruptive editing, and I am now the third user to ask you to refrain from doing so. TempestSounds (talk) 03:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to L.W. (album), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 13:54, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Goo (album), you may be blocked from editing. Rob van vee 12:20, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at The 1975. Binksternet (talk) 20:45, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:02, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]