User talk:Sydney.ebner5678

Welcome!

Hello, Sydney.ebner5678, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 19:59, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please use this Talk page for any questions that you have about the assignment. I will do my best to answer them here for easy reference. Hoopes (talk) 21:47, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Feder

He's a great guy - we've chatted quite a few times and I follow his Twitter feed. But what you've done is original research - please read that and WP:VERIFY. Someone is sure to revert you. Doug Weller talk 19:59, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks as if Doug Weller was correct. Someone reverted your additions. That's too bad, since I think they were helpful. They were also based closely on the work itself, so my own feeling is that the intepretation of original research was overly strict. However, that is up to more experienced Wikipedia editors to decide. It's too bad this article remains so short. Feder's book is incredibly valuable, especially now that it has gone through ten editions. It tends to be known only in academic contexts, but would greatly benefit a wider readership. I hope someone else is able to successful expand this article. Hoopes (talk) 18:59, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries was changed by Sydney.ebner5678 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.947267 on 2020-12-03T20:51:20+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANTH 212 Feedback

I think you've done a really nice job with improving the article on The Demon-Haunted World. The citations and inclusion of comments from critical book reviews is especially helpful, as are your additions regarding Sagan's comments on therapy and false memories. The relevance of this book continues to be demonstrated with the perennial need for better critical thinking. Thanks for choosing this article to improve! Hoopes (talk) 18:48, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I also think you have done a major service in improving and expanding the article on Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries. Unfortunately, I see that a Wikipedia editor reverted all of your additions, saying that the information needed to come from secondary sources. Wikipedia prohibits original research. However, I disagree with their policy of not permitting the book itself to be cited in an analysis of the book itself. My evaluation of your contributions is based on what was reverted, which I think represents a valuable effort! Hoopes (talk) 18:52, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]