User talk:Szwiener26
| This user is a student editor in University_of_St_Thomas/Data_Communication_and_Visualization_(Spring_2021) . |
Welcome
[edit]
|
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Szwiener26, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 00:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]- First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?
- I really liked how clear you were! The information was presented clearly and in a super neutral tone. You presented just the facts like we were taught to. I'm also impressed by the amount of information you had. Nothing superfluous but good stuff to know about this individual.
- What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?
- I would suggest removing the commas between the month and the year as to not congest the article with too much stuff. I also think you should use the individuals last name when referring to them instead of their first name. I think that's pretty common practice on Wikipedia to do and I think it looks better that way.
- What’s the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
- The most important thing you can do to improve the article is to perhaps expand upon this individual's contributions to the Data Science community. You mentioned that at the discussed bias algorithms at a conference in 2020 which was great and I wonder if you can insert more of that into your article to make it feel more substantial. Obviously, you need to be aware of keeping neutral language but I think a little more of that kind of info would benefit the article greatly.
- Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!
- I think I need to expand upon my individual's contribution to the stats/data science community so that they are seen as notable. Joaquincloset (talk) 21:49, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
The article Ayodele Odubela has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Notability not established with substantive independent sources: sources in article are all connected to subject or lack depth.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 5 February 2024 (UTC)