User talk:TPWTD-2017

Welcome!

Hi TPWTD-2017! I noticed your contributions to Roots of Reform Judaism and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Originoa (talk) 06:34, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Motivational Intelligence (MQ) (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheAafi were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Motivational Intelligence (MQ) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

─ The Aafī (talk) 08:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 22:36, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TPWTD-2017 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked and have no idea why, I have not done anything that breaks rules, all I did was submit a wikipedia page for review, some one removed it and I resubmitted an updated version, other than this I have done nothing wrong and no one will tell me whyTPWTD-2017 (talk) 06:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please reread your block notice and WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 10:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TPWTD-2017 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked and have no idea why, I have not done anything that breaks rules, all I did was submit a wikipedia page for review, some one removed it and I resubmitted an updated version, other than this I have done nothing wrong and no one will tell me whyTPWTD-2017 (talk) 06:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One open request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:49, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TPWTD-2017 (talk) 06:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Your reason here [[User:TPWTD-2017|TPWTD-2017]] ([[User talk:TPWTD-2017#top|talk]]) 05:03, 15 February 2023 (UTC)}}

One open unblock request at a time, please. If you are not capable of following simple directions and not willing to address the reason for your block, expect to lose access to this talk page. --Yamla (talk) 13:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also,

Confirmed sockpuppetry. So, don't bother denying your violation of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. --Yamla (talk) 13:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I only have one account, I am a smallUK business owner who has only used this system for a few months and you have accused me of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE, this is not accurate. My initial wikipage was deleted for no reason and I posted it again, if you coupld please let me know exactly what it is I am supposed to have done wrong at least I know and then I can ensure it does not happen again. To just say "don't bother denying your violation" does not help me. I have read through both violations and I have not committed any of them or at least not intentionally. TPWTD-2017 (talk) 14:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to add, I am only trying to understand what I have done wrong, its not about denying my violation if thats what I have done, it trying to understand what exactly I have done wrong. As previously mentioned, I ready through all the violations and cannot see exactly the violation I have committed based on the explanation under both WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. All I am trying to do is post a wikidepia page? TPWTD-2017 (talk) 14:31, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]