User talk:Tancurrom

Welcome!

Hello, Tancurrom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Ventmob, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RadioFan (talk) 12:55, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ventmob

A tag has been placed on Ventmob requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 12:55, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you are editing as part of a school or university assignment...

...please look at these links:

and ask your instructor to look at them, and also at

Wikipedia:School and university projects/Instructions for teachers and lecturers

Writing a Wikipedia article differs in some important respects from writing a normal student paper. One of Wikipedia's key content policies is that we do not publish original work - everything in a Wikipedia article needs to be verifiable from a reliable published source. Please read the policy WP:No original research carefully, in particular the section headed "Synthesis of published material that advances a position".

Also, no Wikipedia article is owned by its author - see WP:OWN - every article may be edited by anyone. You may prefer to create your article in a user sub-page (see WP:UP#Creating user subpages), and move it into the main encyclopedia when it is ready. But all articles must comply with Wikipedia's policies - in particular, subjects must be interesting and important enough to have an encyclopedia article - see the guideline Notability.

The links in the Welcome paragraph above will tell you more about contributing, and you can always ask advice at the WP:Help desk or by leaving a message on my talk page. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:17, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Ventmob" has been deleted because it was clear that its subject was not notable in Wikipedia's sense. You may recreate it if you think that you can demonstrate notability, which would require showing that it has "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 16:22, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]