User talk:Taolan

Welcome

Hello, Taolan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Satu Suro 09:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note

When creating new articles - you must have a good understanding of and clearly use the principles of WP:RS, WP:N, and WP:V - any questions please ask Satu Suro 09:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please help

Why Palembangnese does not show up on either the Library of Congress catalogue [1] or the National LIbrary of Australia library catalogue? [2] Do you have and WP:RS on the subject? - specially any non-web based sources at all? Satu Suro 10:23, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[3] does not use the term either - it would be very important to show good WP:RS for such usage - Satu Suro 10:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Palembangnese

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Palembangnese, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Palembangnese. Caniago (talk) 15:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Palembangese

I have nominated Palembangese, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palembangese. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Caniago (talk) 14:16, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Taolan! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 676 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Nazimin Saily - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ananda Syahendar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:23, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ananda Syahendar

The article Ananda Syahendar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unverifiable BLP. A google search resulted in no coverage in reliable sources, gnews had 0 hits.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 16:43, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nazimin Saily

The article Nazimin Saily has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has been tagged for over a year but remains unreferenced and without evidence of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 09:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]