User talk:Ice Hockey

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Ice Hockey, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 18:55, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Article Resubmission

Hello, Ice Hockey. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by FloBo A boat that can float! (watch me float!) 10:47, 6 August 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Tatratea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FloBo A boat that can float! (watch me float!) 12:55, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Article Resubmission

Hello, Ice Hockey. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by FloBo A boat that can float! (watch me float!) 10:47, 6 August 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Image license question

At File:Tatratea Logo.jpg, you wrote that the file is has a free license (creative-commons), and that "The license statement can be found online at: www.karloff.sk". I was unable to find it there. Could you provide a more specific link or instructions how to navigate through their website to find it? DMacks (talk) 00:53, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DMacks, many thanks for highlighting this issue.

Actually the file was given to me by its owner (the company itself) because I had some difficulties to find the exact logo.

I asked them by email if they could provide me a picture of their own logo because I wanted to create a wikipedia article based on their product portfolio (I discovered it during the SIAL Exhibition in Paris) and they have kindly accepted my request.

Following this statement, I did not know what to tick in the subcategory license and I saw they had the copyright logo at the bottom of their webpage, so I thought it matched with what was expected by Wikipedia.

Was I right thinking that their approval was enough to use their logo in my article ? Many thanks for all your help in this matter.

Tatratea (talk)

Checking with the company is a great idea! Not many people think to simply ask a company or other article-subject for an image and permission to use it.

There are two separate issues: whether the image is usable in the article (which may or may not depend on the license) and what the license of it is (whether it's "free" or not). Licensing policy can be kind of confusing, so here is a bunch of information that at least resolves the main concern of yours and explains what (if any) additional information you might be able to provide to help clarify other details.

If the image has a free license, it can be used pretty much any way you like. But even if it's non-free, wikipedia still allows its use in very limited situations, one of which is a brand-logo in the infobox of an article specifically about that brand. That sort of use of a non-free image does not require any permission from the owner (it's a wikipedia policy that uses an explicit legal exception). So either way, the image is usable in this article.

The only concern is how to classify the license of the image itself. For copyright, the owner controls the use and permissions, so "all rights reserved" means you can do pretty much nothing (and that is the default even if they don't say it), "okay to use this on WP" means exactly that and no more, "Creative commons" is a specific copyright/license that entails a fairly broad range of allowable uses well beyond what a normal copyright would permit. It is one of several "free" licenses that allow reuse, editing, and even commercial redistribution by anyone anywhere. So unless they said "this image is creative-commons license" or "this image is from our website" (and the website explicitly says creative-commons) or comparable terms, it's not CC. I didn't see that on the website, so I was stuck making the safe assumption (to avoid breaking licensing laws) that it was not CC. On the other hand, if the company says "you may use this image on our Wikipedia article", it's definitely not free, because they didn't include all the permissions that are part of the "free" definition. DMacks (talk) 06:26, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DMacks,

Apologies for such a late reply, I did not have so much time to check wikipedia these last days. Just to say you that I changed the logo after having received an email from the Marketing Department of tatratea saying the previous logo was just a visual effect but not the corporate one.

They still agree to broadcast the new one on Wikipedia even if I know (following your last message) that when the image is a brand-logo the owner's permission is not necessary.

I also followed your remarks and improved the classification of the logo by ticking non-free image. I just want to take this opportunity to thank you for all your time.

Cheers !

Ice Hockey (talk)

Conflict of interest

Hello, Ice Hockey. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Tatratea, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Tatratea Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Tatratea Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

Jonathan and Sarah, Teahouse hosts 02:22, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tatratea for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tatratea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatratea until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 15:51, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Corporate Tatratea Logo .jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Corporate Tatratea Logo .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:03, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]