User talk:Tatshro Satou

IM SORRY IF I BECOME A PAIN TO ANYONE ON WIKI BUT I HAVE NOT READ ALL THE RULES ON WIKIPEDIA! SO FORGIVE MY EDITING! I AM NEVER A THREAT TO ANYONE NOR THE SITE! THANK YOU!

Re: Chris Hansen

Are you referring to 70.244.203.29, who left the first comment on the talk page? I traced the IP to Southwestern Bell (based in Texas) but can't get more information than that. I'm wondering how you would have evidence for that person -- there are only 3 edits for that IP, and none of them contain anything incriminating. Anyway, whether or not you should contact the FBI is up to you because I don't know the extent of the evidence you have. Thanks for the message.
--Slyguy 17:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

User:Metros232

He probably thought you were being purposefully annoying. And while I agree that he could have been a bit nicer about it, most users here would agree with him that asking what hardcore child pornography is isn't productive. (Especially since it's pretty obvious: hardcore pornography involving children.) Bugging Jimbo Wales for no reason is also rather frowned upon, since the guy actually has a life and stuff. He already gets tons of people asking him stupid things like "Ban User:X because I said so!" every day.

Anyway, if you have any questions about Wikipedia, how it works, and what we expect of our members, feel free to ask me on my user talk page. --tjstrf talk 16:23, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

It looks like he thought you were trolling and reverted all your other edits that he saw, probably without looking at them closely. You won't get anything done by reporting him, or getting angry, so I'd suggest you calm down.

If I could make another suggestion, it would be that you should read the Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Wikipedia has much stricter rules about how to act on the talk pages than most of the internet does, because it tries to stay professional about things as much as possible. For instance, while on other websites it might be perfectly acceptable to talk like "hi my nm is jared dos ne1 here no abt (whatever)?", if you do that here you'll pretty much end up laughed at or ignored or reverted. (Cursing is similarly frowned upon.) Basically all the behavioural rules amount to is that you try to act like a reasonable adult. Which can be difficult for those of us here who aren't adults yet, but it's certainly manageable.

If you want to be respected here, the best way to do it is to make good edits to articles. Is there anything you are particularly interested in? I notice you've made a few edits to manga and anime related pages, we have a few hundred or thousand articles on those that you could contribute to. Take a look at Category:Manga series and see if there's anything there that catches your eye.

Finally, to answer your question about Welcome to the N.H.K., it is indeed a romance and drama series. It just doesn't seem like it at first. --tjstrf talk 17:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, couldn't respond earlier because I was working. It looks like some of the other people who watch my talk page handled your questions though. The romance bits are apparently later in the series than you have read so far.

The entire thing is drama though, since drama is such a vague genre that it basically means "an emotionally involving story". --tjstrf talk 20:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

Asking a question in the wrong place isn't vandalism. Please don't bite the newbies, and don't make false accusations of vandalism. WilyD 17:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

• A new user doesn't know where to ask a question, so asks it at a generic help desk. This isn't vandalism. He asked whether it'd be possible to increase the potency of some drug by a method - it was a very clear question. Of course, Wikipedia does not give medical advice, and I told him as much. Please see WP:VANDAL if you're unclear about what a vandal is. WilyD

for the love of...am i the olny one who thinks a question like that is not vandalism?! --Tatshro Satou 17:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

No, we all think that question is not vandalism. It just wasn't asked at the reference desk, which would be a more appropriate place to ask (although again, no medical advice.) WilyD 18:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

I don't particularly think he was an editor, but we have reference desks for readers to ask questions, which seems to match the description. There's no particular reason to think he was a jackoff goofing around rather than just someone asking a serious question. WilyD 16:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Help!

My image was removed from wiki! The image made wiki critiea! And it was removed by someone! I did everything i was told to do! I was showing it off so i can recamend it to be used on the lolicon/ecchi pages! --Tatshro Satou 16:04, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

It was removed for a reason. Contact the remover. {Slash-|-Talk} 21:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Reason for deletion was WP:CSD#I3. See the deletion log.[1] –Gunslinger47 21:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello Saikano

Hi Saikano. Please make sure you don't engage in the same kind of unhelpful behavior that has gotten your other accounts blocked. Friday (talk) 16:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

• cring* I dont wana go! Please dont take me! Im trying and I am really sorry for my past creations! Just please dont do it I beg of you!--Tatshro Satou 17:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

uw-chat2

Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Ai (poet) for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. –Gunslinger47 16:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Legal threats

Hello. Regarding this edit, please do not make legal threats (see WP:NLT). You clearly do not have a clear understanding of the issue at hand and it is therefore highly inappropriate to threaten another editor with FBI intervention. If you have concerns in this matter, please report them to an administrator at WP:ANI, but do not repeat legal threats or else you will be blocked from editing. Rockpocket 17:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

what?! legal action is illegal to! My word How many rules do i have to read?!--Tatshro Satou 17:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

It's safe to say that if you're about to do something that is drastic and you're unsure if it's okay, check first. Leebo ^T/C 17:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

You don't have to read some big rulebook. Just work on articles and leave other editors alone. If there's an issue, someone more experienced can deal with it. Friday (talk) 17:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Try the five pillars to start off with, then easy yourself in slowly. As the other editors suggest, what you shouldn't do is get involved in issues you do not fully understand, especially serious ones like threatening to report someone to the FBI. Now, I hope your threat was an empty one and that you haven't actually reported anyone. But if you did, I would strongly recommend you read more carefully what happened, then reconsider your position. Rockpocket 17:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. –Gunslinger47 17:24, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

i will do that! Over my spring break i will read all the rules to avoid ANY more blocks for my stupit, ignorant, ways! Hope we can start all over again! guess not! o well se ya in 2 weeks!Kanpai!!!! --Tatshro Satou 17:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

I do not recall attacking anyone and if so my def. of attack is dead wrong! Please stop picking on me! I REALLY dont wana go! It took me everything to even return to wiki because i really dont wana be looked at the wrong way!--Tatshro Satou 17:35, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Suggestion

Regarding the question you posted on my talk, please read the policy. It mentions that legal threats are considered personal attacks.

I suggest that you stay away from talk pages until you fully understand the Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. When on user talk pages, remember to comment on content, not on contributors. Finally, Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Thank you for your diligent campaign against child pornography, but please take your energies and direct them somewhere more useful. Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. –Gunslinger47 17:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Gunslinger, he was warned for the legal threat. You didn't need to warn him again with a standard template. Leebo ^T/C 17:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

The warning was added after this comment, which was posted after your warnings. This user has expressed the willingness to abide by the rules, and the standard templates appear to be more effective at getting the point across. –Gunslinger47 17:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

yes i will do that! sorry!--Tatshro Satou 17:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Taste.

Perhaps you should read Bad taste (sociology). I'm not sure anybody has really appreciated much of what you have said.[Mαc Δαvιs] (How's my driving?) ❖ 02:50, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Talk pages

This is the same thing we asked you not to do before. Talk pages are for discussing the improvement of the article, and here you're posting "risqué" questions. Try not to do that, it's disruptive. Leebo ^T/C 13:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Questions that don't relate to improving the article, such as bettering your understanding of the plot of a fictional work, should be asked at a site specific to that work. There are questions that are inappropriate to be asked at Wikipedia. The quote you're asking about seems to be extremely minor; I doubt it would be mentioned in the article in a substantial way. Leebo ^T/C 13:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Talk pages cannot be used for that purpose, even though this is an encyclopedia. They are not for talking about "anything and everything related to the subject." They are for talking about improving the article. Ask questions at the reference desk or go to a site that specializes in the subject you wish to learn about. My concern for this specific question was that it seems like you are more likely bringing attention to a pedophilia related situation in the game rather than expressing genuine uncertainty. Perhaps if you asked questions that were less likely to spark controversial discussions (something you have done on all your accounts), it wouldn't be as big of a concern. Leebo ^T/C 16:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

BAKA!!!

I have been doing nonthing wrong!!! Orther then makeing scokpuppets, which I never herd of untill my secend account and never really understud it untill my third account!!! Its not fair!!! Its not like Im returning nonstop just to VANDALIZE THE SITE!!! or THREATNING ANY USER I RUN IN TO WITH HARM!!! I have avoided the pedophile artical to avoid and more problems!!! BE FAIR!!! Dont remove me just for trying to help!!! Not arguing with people!!! Not yelling PEDOPHILE at any unusal user user i run in to!!! For the love of NEKO, STOP PICKING ON ME FOR NONTHING!!! Im not doing a damn thing harmful to myself(like I care), To orther users, To articals, nowhere!!! Im not makeing up fake articals and things!!! Its obv. I am no threat PERIOD!!! For the love of Neko GIVE ME A DAMN CHANCE!!! PLEASE!!! Forget my stupit account creations, forget my "sockpuppets", for get it all!!! I want to edit wikipedia.org!!! It is obv. I am doing MAJOR research to help wikipedia!!! What do i have to do to get you people to belive that IM DIFFERENT FROM USER:SAIKANO!!! Now i want to type up the HORRIBLE TRADGIDY THAT COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED IF THE DAMN ADM. WOULD OF PUT THE DAMN AREA ON F***ING MASS LOCKDOWN AT THE FIRST SHOT IN THE FIRST SHOOTING!!! Virginia Tech Massacre!!! TRUST ME I WONT EVER BE WARNED BY ANY USER OF BLOCKS EVER AGAIN!!! PLEASE!!! MY FRIEND(girl) WAS KILLED IN THE "VTM!!!" GODDAMN IT!!!--KANPAI!!! 16:16, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

You should have been blocked as soon as you made a new account, but we gave you a chance to not be disruptive. I think these two edits (acting uncivil to another user and making inappropriate comments about a living person) sealed the deal. You said you wouldn't be disruptive. You were. Leebo ^T/C 16:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

---

What the fuck are you talking about? --Kronecker 08:57, 18 April 2007 (UTC)