User talk:Taztouzi

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Adriana Lima. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 21:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Soprano, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Princess Lirin (talk) 22:31, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Mister World 2010. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:25, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mister World 2010. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:25, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Susfele (talk) 16:58, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you know, the edit you have made to Mister World 2010 is a contentious edit. You have removed material supported by four citations (including a citation to the official Mister World 2010 web site) and replaced it with unsourced content. You have failed to discuss your change on the article's talk page in accordance with Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Please explain your substitution so that we make work toward a consensus regarding the content of that page. Susfele (talk) 17:07, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Report at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

There is a report concerning you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. You may like to participate in discussion there. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:20, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 06:50, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--PMDrive1061 (talk) 20:57, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Agenceluxe for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. John KB (talk) 01:25, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]