User talk:Teachingyeshua

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 19:50, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012 http://.teachingyeshua.com

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Hebrew Roots. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Zad68 20:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hebrew Roots with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MsFionnuala (talk) 20:37, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:41, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Please. I really don't want you to get blocked, but you need to understand that there's a certain way we do things here. Evanh2008 ^{(talk|contribs)} 21:40, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Evanh2008 ^{(talk|contribs)} 22:03, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you will probably not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 22:31, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Teachingyeshua (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. When I make a factual change to a page and 5 or 6 other editors keep changing the edit because they don't want people to know about, that doesn't make me an edit warrrior. It makes them edit warriors. What you should do is validate my fact, via the reference and let it alone. Several of these pages are biased and only want certain information public, hence why they are warring against putting the stated fact on the page. If you look at the edit logs you will see that there are bunches of editors that control the page according to their bias and not according to fact. If you are going to run wikepeida like their homepages then stop calling it an encyclopedia.

Proposed Change:

Many Hebrew Roots sects claim that Yeshua is the Living Torah, the Torah in the flesh, or one with the Torah. They say this in an attempt reconcile the Torah and the Shema with the teachings of the New Testament.

Some teachers have corrected and reconciled these teachings of the Torah, the Shema, and the New Testament by showing that the Messiah is the Countenance of YHWH and is literally "one" with God", being the manifest presence of YHWH (the image of God). (Youtube-"Resurrection Torah Code-2012", by Ken Mentell Teaching Yeshua www.teachingyeshua.com, "Yeshua the Living Torah", by Michael Bugg 2012, "What is Torah", Eddie Chumney, 2012)

Decline reason:

No, you can't use Wikipedia to promote your site. It is explained in your block message, probably you should read it? Max Semenik (talk) 18:24, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Teachingyeshua (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

New Proposed Change... Many Hebrew Roots sects claim that Yeshua is the Living Torah, the Torah in the flesh, or one with the Torah. They say this in an attempt reconcile the Torah and the Shema with the teachings of the New Testament. Some teachers have corrected and reconciled these teachings of the Torah, the Shema, and the New Testament by showing that the Messiah is the Countenance of YHWH and is literally "one" with God, being the manifest presence of YHWH (the image of God). (Youtube-"Resurrection Torah Code-2012", by Ken Mentell,"Yeshua the Living Torah", by Michael Bugg 2012, "What is Torah", Eddie Chumney, 2012)

Decline reason:

You are still promoting your own source, even if you removed the link. It is evident that you have either not read, or have failed to understand Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. It is also abundantly clear that you have not fully read your block message above; your username alone warrants an indef block, regardless of your editing intentions. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:50, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note from blocking admin. Please read a fuller discussion of the conflicts and other problems with Teachingyeshua. The only difference in the latest appeal is he has removed the website reference - the material is essentially the same.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:43, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]