User talk:Technoratti
November 2011
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at CueCat. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:19, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello Bbb23, and thank you for the three edit warning. Can you help me with this below? Are you different?
(cur | prev) 21:05, 12 November 2011 Bbb23(talk | contribs) (17,334 bytes) (→Introduction: based on Spolsky's notability as a critic, added one sentence about his review) (undo)
(cur | prev) 20:19, 12 November 2011 Bbb23(talk | contribs) (16,951 bytes) (→See also: remove irrelevant articles) (undo)
(cur | prev) 20:13, 12 November 2011 Bbb23(talk | contribs) (17,064 bytes) (→Introduction: added tag - too much unsourced material in section) (undo)
(cur | prev) 20:12, 12 November 2011 Bbb23(talk | contribs) (17,021 bytes) (→Introduction: removed Spolsky paragraph - WP:SPS) (undo)
(cur | prev) 20:10, 12 November 2011 Bbb23(talk | contribs) m (17,701 bytes) (→Introduction: fixed cite) (undo)
(cur | prev) 20:07, 12 November 2011 Bbb23(talk | contribs) (17,811 bytes) (→Introduction: tweak wording and edited cites) (undo)
(cur | prev) 20:03, 12 November 2011 Bbb23(talk | contribs) (18,164 bytes) (→Introduction: rewording assertions to match sources) (undo)
(cur | prev) 19:55, 12 November 2011 Bbb23(talk | contribs) (18,595 bytes) (→Introduction: copy edits and removal of some editorialization) (undo)
Technoratti (talk) 02:24, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't post a 3RR warning.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:27, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia,
Do you have any connection to the blocked editor called Proofplus, who has contributed extensively to CueCat, an article you've also taken an interest in? Cullen328 Let's discuss it 02:49, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at CueCat shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. MikeWazowski (talk) 04:36, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Mangoe (talk) 18:25, 15 November 2011 (UTC)