User talk:Tellmema321
April 2021
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ulster Unionist Party have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ulster Unionist Party was changed by Tellmema321 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929622 on 2021-04-27T11:35:25+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:35, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Tellmema321, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Tellmema321! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 28 April 2021 (UTC) |
October 2023
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Steve Aiken, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
See guidance at MOS:CREDENTIAL, we don't use "Dr". Kathleen's bike (talk) 12:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you.
Again See guidance at MOS:CREDENTIAL, we don't use post-nominals for degrees. Kathleen's bike (talk) 12:45, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Kathleen's bike (talk) 15:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Your threatening language is not appreciated. No disruptive, inapproprivate or hard-to-read formatting has been used. Corrections have been made to correct FACTUALLY incorrect information posted on this page by you and others. Will consider reporting your threats if they continue, even if you are a .bot. Tellmema321 (talk) 10:01, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- The warnings are appropriate for your continued disregard for [[MOS:CREDENTIAL[[. Since you apparently have failed to read it, it says "Post-nominal letters for academic degrees following the subject's name (such as Steve Jones, PhD; Margaret Doe, JD) may occasionally be used within an article where the person with the degree is not the subject, to clarify that person's qualifications with regard to some part of the article, though this is usually better explained in descriptive wording. Avoid this practice otherwise." Thus, it does not get added to Steve Aiken's article. Kathleen's bike (talk) 10:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- Similarly the title Commander is not appropriate as the person is Retired. Please update to be Retired, Royal Navy. Tellmema321 (talk) 10:34, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- The warnings are appropriate for your continued disregard for [[MOS:CREDENTIAL[[. Since you apparently have failed to read it, it says "Post-nominal letters for academic degrees following the subject's name (such as Steve Jones, PhD; Margaret Doe, JD) may occasionally be used within an article where the person with the degree is not the subject, to clarify that person's qualifications with regard to some part of the article, though this is usually better explained in descriptive wording. Avoid this practice otherwise." Thus, it does not get added to Steve Aiken's article. Kathleen's bike (talk) 10:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Kathleen's bike. I noticed that you recently made an edit in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.
Hello, I'm Kathleen's bike. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kathleen's bike (talk) 15:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Kathleen's bike (talk) 14:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC)