User talk:Tensinet

Welcome!

Hello, MSPROJECTBUREAU, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! — Æµ§œš¹ _{[ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ]} 18:23, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arkitektura sizmike

The article Arkitektura sizmike has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:NBOOK

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 19:21, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Arkitektura sizmike, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Widr (talk) 20:22, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mentor Llunji for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mentor Llunji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mentor Llunji until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 11:21, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "MSPROJECTBUREAU", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a change of username, by completing this form, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 09:54, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Mentor Llunji. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:45, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seismic architecture has been redirected to Earthquake engineering

Hi there Tensinet. I'm the administrator who closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mentor Llunji. After deleting that article, I had a look at Seismic architecture and noticed that it was largely sourced to works by Mentor Llunji, who the community has decided isn't notable enough to merit an article at this point. If you'd like to make contributions to Earthquake engineering, I'd suggest using more recognised sources -- or work with other editors on that article's talk page to find a consensus about your preferred sources. A Train^talk 15:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Train..Well done for closing the article, i hope the Wikipedia users will benefit from its shrinking due its administrators ignorance..Relying on your great architectural and seismic design expertise your probably done the appropriate move by redirecting (misdirecting) Seismic architecture to Earthquake engineering..No one knows why you didn't redirect it to Architecture, but who cares,Wikipedia offers great freedom so that everyone can do what they want regardless of the level of incompetency on whatever topic. But i need to acknowledge that your learn very well two things, to delete and to redirect...not more and not less..Bravo again and wish you a short career as administrator.

I've been an administrator for 12 years, actually. :) I'm sorry you feel that way, but if you would like to continue contributing, please take the time to read the relevant policies and guidelines before insinuating that others don't know what they're doing. For a start, I'd recommend WP:Deletion process. A Train^talk 16:24, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting the article not knowing a thing about the topic is the greatest 'insinuation' and misuse of your position as administrator. .....dear Train, you should have learned in these 12 years that Wikipedia is built on contribution..some writes one part, another contribute with another reference and so on..and after a time we got a completed article which can inform people interested in specific topics..mr.Llunji is one of the few together with A.Charleson and R.Reitherman who started this new approach on architecture and seismic engineering..Redirecting either to [Earthquake engineering] or [Architecture] is very inappropriate..But who cares..delete and redirect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.161.113.169 (talk) 16:45, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]