User talk:Teoph

Hi there, 189.6.238.83! Do not add any nazi revisionist sources, thank you! Antique Rose (talk) 22:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Teoph for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. --Good Damon 23:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Posen Speech" page and "Heinrich Himmler" page[edit]

User "165.189.169.190, Antique_Rose, AniMate, Jayjg" is deleting my contribution about Heinrich Himmler´s Posen Speech ceaselessly and recently has used Twinkle to block me as vandalism because I pointed to Arthur Butz book as the source of information I have from IMT documents. Please, it´s not possible that someone acts in such a way in this "free" encyclopedia. If information has to come only from "certain" accepted sources, this is a biased "free" encyclopedia.

Thank you

No, information has to come from "certain" accepted sources in order to keep it free from bias. Wikipedia has very strict rules about reliable sources for information. If a source doesn't match that criteria -- and Arthur Butz isn't recognized by any mainstream media as an expert on the holocaust -- then that source can't be used. It's that simple. If we could use any source at all, then I could write up a web page claiming that Mars is made entirely out of chocolate, then cite my own web page on Wikipedia. --Good Damon 00:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only link I have from IMT documents volume 13, since they are not available on the internet. So, "Posen Speech" will remain very incomplete and erroneous because Wikipedia doesn´t accept a Book that is not mainstream and that refers to official documents. This is a biased information that doesn't allow discussion and doesn't do any good for the wealth of information and compromise with truth.

Thank you

Forgive me for being harsh, but get over it. Either cite the documents you're referring to directly -- are they available in a library? -- or find a different, reliable source for your edits. I honestly doubt you will; no reliable source will touch Nazi propaganda with a ten-foot pole. But if you do, and incorporate an edit that is both neutral in tone and informative, it will be examined much more closely than the Holocaust-denier you've been trying to insert. --Good Damon 00:42, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you for your comprehension, I will try to find copies of the originals.

You won´t accept any contempt of your truth. I´m going to Metapedia and transfer my contribution to "metallurgy" to Metapedia. Keep it with your biased trash wikipedia. You can also unblock Heinrich Himmler´s page. That was only to know how biased the administrators of this site are. And, please, don't go to Metapedia to impose your truth and delete other´s contributions because they are not mainstream! And you probably will do this, unfortunately I think you will always try to chase whoever dares your partiality.

Posen speech[edit]

Copied from here I have some concerns about your edits to entry on the Posen speech. I believe that you are operating threee sockpuppets in order to insert your point of view. I've raised concerns about you and Teoph (talk · contribs), Johanneskirchner (talk · contribs), and Earlybegin (talk · contribs) at WP:AN/I#Posen speech. AniMate 23:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]