User talk:TexMurphy/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Merger Proposal Follow Up

Following up on my message regarding the proposed merger of George Scelle and Georges Scelle. I went ahead and merged the two articles in question. --TommyBoy 07:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Deletion tags

You are doing a fine job at identifying potentioal speedy candidates. You could further help by placing the appropiate warning tag in the authors talkpage, which will help identify re-creations. Agathoclea 19:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films February Newsletter

The February 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 talk 23:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Jumpgate

Hiya Tex, did you play Jumpgate by any chance? Intinn^Talk! 15:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

• Nope, never tried it. Looks a bit like Eve Online, which I'm actually trying out with the 14 day trial at the moment. - TexMurphy 15:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Goodluck with that! Tried Eve a few years ago but it couldn't quite grab me ;) Anyway, have fun! Intinn^Talk! 15:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Age category

Hello! If you are receiving this message, that means that your user page is in a specific year category. Per a recent user-category per deletion, all specific year categories are to be deleted. If you wish to continue using year categories, you have two options:

• Using an age group category, such as Category:Wikipedians in their 30s
• Using a decade category, such as Category:Wikipedians born in the 1970s.

If you wish, you may do both. Hopefully, this change in categorization will be quick and painless. Happy editing! --An automated message from MessedRobot 12:34, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the pointers. I hope the new page meets the criteria for companies. Please let me know if I should change anything else. I was reading up on travel companies for an essay and noticed Travel Republic had displaced Expedia and skyscanner in Travel Weekly magazines agent rankings. Seemed like a valid reason for an entry. Now I want to know if I should buy stock before they follow Lastminute's example. ;-) Seomancer 06:49, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Oops

I removed your AIV report regarding Angela51194 since the account only had one visible contrib at the time, but I saw that Edgar181 later blocked them all the same. I hadn't looked at his/her talk page, previously, and missed the whole series of warnings about nonsense pages. My mistake. – Luna Santin (talk) 22:33, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Scampi diSanti - is this reduced article more acceptable?

Scampi diSanti are smoked black tiger prawns aimed at a comparable market to that of caviar, oysters and champagne.

The smoking process for black tiger prawns was developed over many years by Gourmet Generation GmbH of Bremerhaven. Kuhlmann GmbH in Offenbach has the exclusive right to sell the smoked prawns.

Scampi diSanti prawns are smoked without their head and tail. Therefore, the net weight of the product corresponds to the total amount consumed.

Further characteristics of Scampi diSanti are a crunchy texture and an individual smoky taste. The smoking process aims to retain all the healthy vitamins and minerals, which are normally lost during boiling, frying or grilling.

Restaurants, such as Sansibar on the island of Sylt, and well known chefs are developing official serving suggestions for Scampi diSanti. They are being published on the Scampi diSanti website and elsewhere. Thkbc 12:20, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Local Church Article

I believe the Original Article is a bit bias, and the name is incorrect. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gillettextra (talk • contribs) 09:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC).

Jiminy Christmas

I just started creating my first page and before I can even hit save on the first revision its marked up and deleted ... are you just sitting around waiting to crush the spirit of newbies? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bwsmoney (talk • contribs) 16:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC).

Dover Rowing Club

Why are u such a dick munch. WHat gives you the right to delete a page that i created and got permission from, just cos you're Swedish doesn't mean you have to take it out on the rest of us you dick. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sw3nick (talk • contribs)

• My reply to this troll post

John P. Ryan

[1] - —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.222.38.127 (Talk) (talk • contribs)

March WP:FILMS Newsletter

The March 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by Cbrown1023 talk 00:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the trolling on my talk page. Leebo ^T/C 14:51, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Speedys

Just to let you know Digifreak642 is changing some comments on here. Looks like you nabbed him with some speedy deletions for nonsense articles. He tried to make an article about you, but its been speedy deleted also. **edit looks like the vandalism on here got reverted --Csodennc 18:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I reverted his vandalism here, after I speedied the nonsense article he created about Tex. It's a pity some people can't think of anything better to do with their time, yes? Cheers! ---Charles 23:50, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Cheers for reverting the vandalism. I agree, he should find something more constructive to do with his time. - TexMurphy 07:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

April 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The April 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 22:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

May 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 22:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

June 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The June 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. --Nehrams2020 09:13, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 19:58, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter

The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 13:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Gray matters movie poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gray matters movie poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:31, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films roll call

Hey fellow Wikipedian! Your username is listed on the WikiProject Films participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name to the Active Members list. You may also wish to add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. We also have several task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.

Also, elections for Project Coordinators are currently in sign-up phase. If you would be interested in running, or would like to ask questions of the candidates, please take a look. You can see more information on the positions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators. Thanks and happy editing!

An automatic notification by BrownBot 01:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Hoax film poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Hoax film poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:08, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter

The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 00:05, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for visiting the Underworld

clicketyclick has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!

I just wanted to thank you for patrolling new pages like mine and slapping on a much needed future game tag (rather than something like a speedy deletion tag!) I appreciate that you took time to look over my newly hobbled together article, so thanks! clicketyclick_yaketyyak 19:28, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Alexandra Rapaport.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Alexandra Rapaport.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. β^_command 22:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Noll tolerans dvd cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Noll tolerans dvd cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Missing in action (film poster).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Missing in action (film poster).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Joan of arc (1948 film poster).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Joan of arc (1948 film poster).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2