User talk:Texasstorm

This is Texasstorm's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sedgeford Hall Portrait has been accepted

Sedgeford Hall Portrait, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements for Sedgeford Hall Portrait

Hello, Sedgeford Hall Portrait still needed some work, but it's very clearly a valid Wikipedia topic and the sourcing met basic standards, so I went ahead and approved it but I left some markers at the top for things that should still be improved. Please take a look and do the little polishing needed. Great idea for an article, definitely a valuable addition! Thanks! MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please check Sedgeford Hall Portrait

Please check Sedgeford Hall Portrait when you are able. At minimum, the 3rd bullet point re. location of painting has been fixed. Some sources have been added (re. first two bullet points), but it's possible others may be able to improve sourcing further. Thanks, by the way, for approving the article. I was surprised that one didn't exist. Texasstorm (talk) 01:45, 11 March 2016 (UTC) Texasstorm (talk) 01:43, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Texasstorm! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How can I get editing authority on the Pocahontas article?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Irene Bedard

Hi Texasstorm, Thanks for letting me know you changed it. I agree with you completely about wanting Wikipedia articles to be correct, accurate, and true. I am a long-time acquaintance-friend of Irene. I based that on what she told me about 20 years ago. My memory was she told me that they had done a series of sketches of her in various poses to use for building the animated Pocahontas character. After I made the additions to her page, I sent an email to Irene and asked her to review what I had written for accuracy, but she hasn't gotten back to me. I haven't communicated with her in a couple of years, so I don't know for sure if the email address I have is still operational.

I see that you just dropped the information about Irene as the model for the character, without adding anything. Let's just leave it the way you corrected it, at least until we can hear back from Irene. It really isn't an important issue at this point for Irene's page. Thanks for your time.Time River (talk) 20:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]