User talk:ThatrandomPERSAAAN

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Governor William Sprague Mansion, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Governor William Sprague Mansion was changed by ThatrandomPERSAAAN (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850461 on 2011-06-12T17:21:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:21, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Iowa Idiots

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Iowa Idiots requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. role^player 17:22, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Roleplayer. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. role^player 20:22, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ThatrandomPERSAAAN. You have new messages at Roleplayer's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Worcester, Massachusetts, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. role^player 21:50, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 21:55, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ThatrandomPERSAAAN (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand why i was blocked. i thought i still had one more chance. ThatrandomPERSAAAN (talk) 21:58, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You blew it with this. This is not YouTube; this is not Myspace. This is Wikipedia, and we have a standard of conduct in which all editors need to abide by. You have demonstrated that you cannot, hence why you have been blocked. –MuZemike 22:08, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In addition, your using of The Big Fucker (talk · contribs) on Wikipedia is grossly inappropriate, and you knew it. –MuZemike 22:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]