User talk:TheCityStars
July 2020
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Once Upon a Time in New York City has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Once Upon a Time in New York City was changed by TheCityStars (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954333 on 2020-07-07T18:38:36+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:38, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Malrink AKA Mildred huxtetter
[edit]User:Malrink (a sock of User:Mildred huxtetter) added the character summaries on The Fox and the Hound. So shouldn't they be removed? TheCityStars (talk) 18:51, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
@Geraldo Perez: Do you plan to edit any of the articles I edited? There is work to be done on all of them. TheCityStars (talk) 18:56, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- They were removed, then someone else restored them and the person who restored the edits now owns them. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- So, Malrink AKA Mildred huxtetter owns the edits on The Fox and the Hound out of shear convenience. Obviously I could tell that. But what I mean is, shouldn't you want to re-remove because of him being banned like me A, him restoring my older edits B, and C because of the excessive and OR descriptions. Now do you see what I mean? TheCityStars (talk) 19:01, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- No, the person who restored the edits has decided they were worthy of being in the article. Of course if one banned user reverts edits by another banned user some judgment is called for as to how to handle this. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- But do you think they're worthy of being in the article? Also what does @Doniago: think? TheCityStars (talk) 19:09, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- I think you've been blocked for evading a block, so I'm not overly-inclined to pay much attention to this conversation. DonIago (talk) 19:18, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- But do you think they're worthy of being in the article? Also what does @Doniago: think? TheCityStars (talk) 19:09, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- No, the person who restored the edits has decided they were worthy of being in the article. Of course if one banned user reverts edits by another banned user some judgment is called for as to how to handle this. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- So, Malrink AKA Mildred huxtetter owns the edits on The Fox and the Hound out of shear convenience. Obviously I could tell that. But what I mean is, shouldn't you want to re-remove because of him being banned like me A, him restoring my older edits B, and C because of the excessive and OR descriptions. Now do you see what I mean? TheCityStars (talk) 19:01, 7 July 2020 (UTC)