User talk:TheDelhiBoy2

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, TheDelhiBoy2. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Amar Singh (art dealer), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bishonen | tålk 21:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The biography of Amar Singh seems to be your only interest on Wikipedia. Please reply below as to whether or not you have a conflict of interest before editing elsewhere again. Bishonen | tålk 21:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC).[reply]
no conflict of interest TheDelhiBoy2 (talk) 21:17, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
When you say you have no conflict of interest, I'm afraid it's difficult to believe you. You are apparently only on Wikipedia for the purpose of removing anything that can be seen as negative against Singh, however well sourced. Can you explain why you do this, and only this, here, if you are in no way related to or otherwise connected with Singh, and are not being paid to edit his biography? Bishonen | tålk 21:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Also, where exactly have you reported the page for "vandalism", as you state in the edit summary here? Bishonen | tålk 21:31, 27 October 2023 (UTC).[reply]
nothing has been been deleted from the page at present that Uhooep wrote. So not possible to 'remove anything that can be seen as a negative' if nothing has been removed.

reported via email: info- en-q @ wikipedia. org TheDelhiBoy2 (talk) 21:42, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

email fround here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Libel TheDelhiBoy2 (talk) 21:42, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --VViking_TalkEdits 23:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uhooep has had a history of systemic bias with this wikipedia article stemming far beyond 2023. You should investigate why that is. TheDelhiBoy2 (talk) 23:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. VViking_TalkEdits 23:35, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uhooep has had a history of systemic bias with this wikipedia article stemming far beyond 2023. You should investigate why that is. The Wiki has been hijacked for a very long time and I'm trying to make it as unbiased as possible. TheDelhiBoy2 (talk) 23:38, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:42, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to flag up that user Uhooep also made 5 reverts during the Amar Singh (art dealer) edit war and has not been reported. TheDelhiBoy2 (talk) 15:26, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That violates 3RR rule? TheDelhiBoy2 (talk) 15:30, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]