User talk:The Old Editor Of Wiki

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tariq Ahmed Wani (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Youknowwhoistheman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tariq Ahmed Wani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Youknow? (talk) 14:34, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Old Editor Of Wiki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Youknow? (talk) 14:34, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tariq Ahmed Wani (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tariq Ahmed Wani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 16:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tariq Ahmed Wani has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tariq Ahmed Wani. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 16:08, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Abdul Bari Naik (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Your sources all point to the homepage? We need links to the specific articles. But I am also not sure how this person passes WP:NACADEMIC.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Abdul Bari Naik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 16:20, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

[[ File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:36, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your village article appears to be a genuine attempt to contribute, which is why I've not indefinitely blocked you, please don't write promotional biographies again though Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:43, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak like u .I also want to contribute the genuine and accurate information .. And same I did ..but I don't know why you blocked me for 2 weeks ...it is not promotional or anything that I will get paid ..ok The Old Editor Of Wiki (talk) 15:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]