User talk:Thereturned

Third opinion, as it were[edit]

With respect to the message you posted at Third Opinion - I'm confused what you mean.
If you're saying that he's been reverting you on other pages (i.e. wikistalking), please provide links and I can give them a very unofficial eyeball to see whether he's being reasonable or unreasonable.
But if you're saying that he's only reverting the messages on his talk page, you have the cart before the horse. It's not productive to speculatively discuss whether he will revert you or not. It may be well-intentioned, but it's inflammatory to speculate. If he does, it can be addressed then. arimareiji (talk) 14:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Please respond here; I've now got this page on my watchlist. It'll only make it confusing if we bounce it back and forth between each other's talkpages.) arimareiji (talk) 14:48, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(Also Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User:Thereturned). — Athaenara ✉ 03:43, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that last time I was banned, I was told to try again in three months. I did this but Schumin just ignores my posts. It is unfair, I have been trying for 18 months very patiently to get back in here, but he just ignores me. Thereturned (talk) 14:30, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you're afraid he'll revert your edits on pages other than his talk page, isn't it a good thing if he ignores you?

But if you're trying to force him to talk to you, that's a Really Bad Idea. And it'll just get you banned again. arimareiji (talk) 16:19, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block: Sock of banned user[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for user:Johnjoecavanagh, still bugging the same people that got you banned in the past, unable to resist name calling. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--barneca (talk) 17:32, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thereturned (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Like greater minds before me once said, "We shall overcome".

Decline reason:

Nonsensical troll request. Page to be protected so users with serious problems don't have to wait for admins to deal with this crap. — Daniel Case (talk) 22:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.