Jump to content

User talk:Thomassailors

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lanette Freitag moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Lanette Freitag, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sea Cow (talk) 15:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lanette Freitag (March 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-Liancetalk/contribs 16:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Thomassailors! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liancetalk/contribs 16:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lanette Freitag (March 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
nearlyevil665 17:58, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article FeltLOOM has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sea Cow (talk) 23:16, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sea Cow Thank you for helping me. I've since added citations to multiple, significant sources dating back to 2003, including the Lexington Herald-Leader, The Robesonian, University of Kentucky (uky.edu), Messenger-Inquirer and The Advocate-Messenger. I've also added 'External Links' which cannot be citated as sources, but believe help demonstrate why FeltLOOM is notable, per Wikipedia's 'notability' guidelines page.
Most of the new sources are from newspaper.com. Since this site is password-protected, I downloaded the articles and uploaded the articles to FeltLOOM.com, and linked directly to them. If this is improper, I hope I will have an opportunity correct this before permanent deletion; I could not find specific instruction on how to handle this type of source.
Appreciate your guidance and patience on this, and look forward to any feedback you would be willing to share. Thomassailors (talk) 11:48, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Needle felting machine moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Needle felting machine, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 14:33, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FeltLOOM moved to draftspace[edit]

Please refer to log comments. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:20, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MrsSnoozyTurtle thank you for allowing me to continue to work on this page. Are you able to help me understanding which of my references are not considered independent, reliable sources? I appreciate your help. Thomassailors (talk) 12:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Thomas. You're most welcome. Regarding the independent and reliable sources, I would consider that #3 and #5 would meet these requirements. However this doesn't mean that they are automatically of value when it comes to determining a topic's notability, since there are also other factors.

Just checking, do you have any association with the company? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MrsSnoozyTurtle thank you again. Yes, I currently work as a contractor for the company. I believe I disclosed this during the initial setup of the page, but this is my first article on Wikipedia and I may not have checked all the appropriate boxes. Truly appreciate your guidance. If I remove the irrelevant references and related content, and cite only the sources you suggested qualify as legitimate, would this be sufficient to re-publish the article? Thanks again @MrsSnoozyTurtle. Thomassailors (talk) 13:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @MrsSnoozyTurtle,
I believe I have now gathered sufficient, relevant sources for the FeltLOOM Wiki page. Is there a way I can get access to my [now deleted] FeltLOOM Wiki Draft page so I can edit, or do I need to start from scratch? 72.213.36.142 (talk) 14:17, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of FeltLOOM for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FeltLOOM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FeltLOOM until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Star Mississippi 16:49, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Star Mississippi-- I believe I have now gathered sufficient, relevant sources for the FeltLOOM Wiki page. Is there a way I can get access to my [now deleted] FeltLOOM Wiki Draft page so I can edit, or do I need to start from scratch? Thomassailors (talk) 14:20, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Thomassailors! Courtesy ping to @Liz who closed the AfD. I would have no issue restoring the draft if you promise to use AfC and not move it to mainspace without a neutral editor's review, but want her to weigh in. Star Mississippi 15:34, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Thomassailors. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Needle felting machine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lanette Freitag[edit]

Information icon Hello, Thomassailors. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lanette Freitag, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:17, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lanette Freitag[edit]

Hello, Thomassailors. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lanette Freitag".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]