User talk:Tinker Tenor Doctor Spy

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Tinker Tenor Doctor Spy! I am Mysdaao and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Mysdaao ^talk 18:13, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Students for Palestine. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The reason I'm giving you a 3rd level warning is because you're now continuing what you used to do with your previous ID. It's unfair to expect other editors to constantly have to rechech and correct your edits. Please take some time to learn more about WP editing policies before making more edits. Needless to say, if you choose to continue this behaviour I'll have no choice but to have you blocked. Thank you. --Franz.87 (talk) 18:51, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, give me some time and i'll get the references to prove Omar Hassan attempted to make the Monash Student Union take an official stance AGAINST the nation of Israel, and not just the aggression in Gaza. --Tinker Tenor Doctor Spy (talk) 18:56, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have no issues with your petty squabbles against some SFP guy, it concerns me not. The point was for you to stop your non-constructive and problematic editing style, may it be against SFP, or Britney Spears. --Franz.87 (talk) 12:40, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On that note, I don't take 'threats' of blocking/action from non-sysop users. A warning of my behaviour, if it violates rules, I understand, but a warning of action when you have no power to take such action yourself is unwarranted. You should have said "I will have no choice but to request the blocking of your account". --Tinker Tenor Doctor Spy (talk) 18:58, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're totally right about my choice of words, however needless to say, if you choose to continue this behaviour I'll have no choice but to have you reported for blocking. Thank you. --Franz.87 (talk) 12:40, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Project Chanology

I removed your addition to Project Chanology, the sources do not support these claims. The sources do not mention Anonymous or Project Chanology. Cirt (talk) 22:42, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This [1] is disruption. It is unsourced, adds poorly sourced sites that fail WP:RS, and introduces WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. Please remove it from the article. Please be aware that the article is under existing WP:ARBCOM sanctions per WP:ARBSCI. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 22:59, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove this info. I see you have been warned above on this talk page for adding unsourced or original content. Please engage in discussion, at Talk:Project Chanology. Cirt (talk) 23:06, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They thought it was unsourced/original content, it was not, they just refused to listen to the facts I pointed out with my sourced material. --Tinker Tenor Doctor Spy (talk) 23:26, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, the info was not properly sourced, it did not mention Anonymous or Project Chanology anywhere and therefore had nothing to do with the article. Per WP:BURDEN, please do not add it back unless independent reliable secondary sources specifically mention some connection to the article's main subject itself. Cirt (talk) 12:48, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're removing information which is useful to the Project Chanology article. I shall add information which is relevant using even more reliable sources then, and prove to you its relevant. --Tinker Tenor Doctor Spy (talk) 14:24, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[2]. Cirt (talk) 15:18, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

As you've already been told about policy by more than one capable and experienced editor, I wish to ensure that you're aware that any further violations of the aforementioned policies will result in a block to prevent further disruption. I've already removed completely unreferenced controversial information from the article that you had re-added after being told why it didn't meet inclusion criteria. Further, one of the remaining references in your statement is clearly part of an opinion column in a newspaper, and thus its reliability is dubious at best. I advise you to pay attention and discuss further changes as this is the last warning. NJA (t/c) 15:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I referenced WWP, which does have proof of Anonymous using the Nick Xenophon speech to further their efforts. It was removed as 'unreliable' when it should be considered reliable enough considering its direct first hand evidence of what project chanology is focusing on. --Tinker Tenor Doctor Spy (talk) 20:25, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This would require further discussion before the edits to be made live again. Feel free to gather your reliable sources and post them for discussion here or on the article's talk page should that be preferred by you. Cheers, NJA (t/c) 21:00, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]