User talk:Tlkfbywtd

March 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 17:24, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tlkfbywtd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Tlkfbywtd (talk) 04:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Daniel Case (talk) 08:15, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you for your message. I was a bit unsure about this and will follow the guidelines for editing now.

Kindly advise.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tlkfbywtd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the reason for blocking the profile. I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead.

Kindly advise. Tlkfbywtd (talk) 12:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's not enough for you to tell us you understand and repeat platitudes back to us; you must demonstrate your understanding by telling us what you did wrong, specifically what you will do differently, and tell what edits you wish to make. 331dot (talk) 12:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tlkfbywtd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please advise.. I've already raised the request several times, but still it's such a weird type of support.. despite of support and helping the candidate, this is type of help provided.. I wrote what was mentioned by the previous moderator and not just repeating platitudes.. Now I don't want you to unblock me, and thank you for your efforts.. Tlkfbywtd (talk) 15:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to tell us why you were blocked, and what you will do differently, if unblocked, including what edits you will make. PhilKnight (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tlkfbywtd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I added citation links to the related articles, but those articles were not from any authority / popular sites, as mentioned in the Wiki guidelines and now I know what are the authority sites, viz Forbes, etc where there is more information flow.

Decline reason:

No, this is not why you were blocked. Additionally, I'm not convinced you understand English well enough to contribute here (see WP:CIR). "More information flow" is not why Forbes is considered reliable. Yamla (talk) 11:52, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.