User talk:TomJackson95

Welcome!

Hello, TomJackson95, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 21:11, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page PlayStation Network outage do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 21:11, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:TomJackson95/TomJacko95

User:TomJackson95/TomJacko95, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TomJackson95/TomJacko95 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:TomJackson95/TomJacko95 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 01:10, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

American Me

You've made a good start with American Me and I think they're worthy of a page. Though I'm no expert on contemporary U.S. punk, so I'm not wading-in to help much, directly.

I've added some flags which may be scary-looking, but that's not the intent (follow their links for more info). They are intended as [a] advice [b] help attract other appropriate editors [c] inform subsequent reviewers. –DjScrawl (talk) 04:35, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead length, the opening para(s): I almost flagged Template:Lead too short, but held-back, thinking it's 'early days'. You might add a sentence on key releases, e.g.: début, latest and best known (Heat, I think, and notable in its own right). Aesthetically, another six/seven lines of lead would be convenient (stopping the Infobox biting into 'History'). –DjScrawl (talk) 04:35, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Concrete hardcore: This seems like a boutique genre - I've googled en.wikipedia.org and the phase appears on no other page. Also, looking at the Infobox template documentation, you'll see all genre must be wikilinked - While you can't currently link it to hardcore punk, 'cause the word "concrete" does not appear on the page. If I were you, I think, I'd drop it back to metalcore, for now. –DjScrawl (talk) 04:35, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Website: Its unusual to see a band here with a social-network presence for a 'website' - I'm guessing, this may skew notoriety judgements against the page (not beyond the compensation of extra good work in other areas). Also, I know U.S. punk is more 'live oriented' than 'recorded' (when compared to many other genre) - However, 'History' suggests that the band's been "full time" for five years (and Heat was _big_), thus it seems especially odd they've no dedicated website. –DjScrawl (talk) 04:35, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that's all clear and helpful. Keep-up the good work! –DjScrawl (talk) 04:35, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan no more: I've got What links here over three articles, so I've been able to remove the <<Orphan>> template :) There are several more that can be gathered in, found with this Google and I hope I can leave you to do those - They are an important factor in the notoriety proof process. –DjScrawl (talk) 16:55, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:American Me (Band) Performing Live.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:American Me (Band) Performing Live.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Blurred Lines 04:48, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]