User talk:Tomb Blaster
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Tomb Blaster, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Andrew Base (talk) 11:23, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]Hello Tomb Blaster and sorry for the reversions! I don't believe an economy section is necessary in the Scandinavia article and I think it might not be neutral enough to say "known for their high standards of human rights and their tolerance of radicalism and free speech" – this is something that needs an inline citation, for example "The World Bank has classified these countries as X". – Thjarkur (talk) 11:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
- I forgive you for the reversions and thank you for the integrity in accepting your fault. --Tomb Blaster (talk) 11:36, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Martin Selmayr
[edit]
Hello, I'm Mr. Vernon. I noticed that you recently removed content from Martin Selmayr without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mr. Vernon (talk) 17:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Mr. Vernon, hi Mr Vernon. I did actually use the summary both times and I stand by what I said. It wasn't a summary blanking. --Tomb Blaster (talk) 17:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- I don't see how the content you removed improved the quality of the article; Die Welt is highly regarded, one of the cites was a government website. Nothing there seemed to be Nazi. I get you don't like it, but it's sourced. Taking it to the article's Talk page is more appropriate. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- I've done that. --Tomb Blaster (talk) 17:49, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- I don't see how the content you removed improved the quality of the article; Die Welt is highly regarded, one of the cites was a government website. Nothing there seemed to be Nazi. I get you don't like it, but it's sourced. Taking it to the article's Talk page is more appropriate. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)