User talk:TrueInsan
September 2017
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank sourced content from Wikipedia, as you did at Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh. utcursch | talk 21:00, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 23:32, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
TrueInsan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
your reason here TrueInsan (talk) 05:01, 3 September 2017 (UTC) Hello I did not edit anything after the last warning message that Utcursch posted on my page, besides was never once warned about the particular fact that my IP address AS A WHOLE will be banned. but SpacemanSpiff still went ahead and blocked me anyway. I request to be unblocked; will not induldge in editing Ram Rahim article anymore.!@Utcursch @Spacemanspiff and others are kindly requested to unblock me
Decline reason:
You received, and even acknowledged, plenty of warnings. As to your IP address as a whole being blocked, that's completely irrelevant. While this account is blocked, you are not permitted to edit Wikipedia at all. YOU are not permitted to edit. You cannot edit via another account. You cannot edit by signing out. YOU cannot edit at all. And it's very clear you should remain blocked, for the good of Wikipedia. Yamla (talk) 12:48, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- You've been warned more than sufficiently as you acknowledged here. I'm not in favor of you being unblocked as you clearly don't seem to show any interest in following our policies and guidelines or editing collaboratively. That said, another admin will review your unblock request. —SpacemanSpiff 05:05, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Edit2: Reply to @SpacemanSpiff : I do apologize and promise to follow the guidelines in future bro. I was new to editing and honestly did not know at all about the IP address banning rule even right before I was banned.
TrueInsan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #19142 was submitted on Sep 03, 2017 09:13:00. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 09:13, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
TrueInsan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
your reason here TrueInsan (talk) 13:18, 3 September 2017 (UTC)I did not acknowledge the warnings, I did not even read some of the warnings and others were simply about my username being "offensive" which turned out to be not true, so I didn't really get as many warnings as it may seem like. PS: I challenge anyone to prove that I posted anything after Utcursch warned me at 21:00 . So I need a good reason why I am being kept block here
Decline reason:
Your comments relating to the block are largely attacks on other editors, unsubstantiated accusations, and misrepresentations of facts which can easily be checked. None of those are likely to get you unblocked. In addition, your comments about IP blocks make it perfectly clear that your intention was to ignore any block that came, and evade it, either by editing without using an account or by using another account. I have never yet seen an editor unblocked when his or her unblock request indicates an intention of evading the block by sockpuppetry, and I don't expect ever to see one. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:03, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You are not permitted to blank prior unblock declines. Please do not do so again, or we'll have to revoke your access to this page. --Yamla (talk) 14:09, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|your reason here} I am being harassed by this Yamla user he has sent me threatening mails. How do I appeal to the FBI to look into this matter of mental harrasment?I am really serious about this }
This is a lie and I encourage anyone who has access, to confirm this is a lie. I have never sent this user an email via Wikipedia and, to the best of my knowledge, this user has never published their email address so I have not and could not send them an email outside of Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 14:16, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Redacted by Winged Blades of GodricOn leave at 16:09, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Talk page access revoked
[edit]I did think of giving you a warning before revoking talk page access but given that you are only trying to use this page for harassment, I'm removing talk page access. You already know about UTRS, so I'm not leaving a templated note on that. —SpacemanSpiff 14:31, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
TrueInsan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #19169 was submitted on Sep 06, 2017 20:44:59. This review is now closed.