Jump to content

User talk:Truly evil document

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

My edit was perfectly fine. Take care before you accuse people of vandalism. 2A00:23C5:FE18:2700:59D6:A2E3:D03E:9F39 (talk) 20:41, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
You are repeatedly giving incorrect vandalism warnings for good faith edits that are not vandalism. This is not acceptable. Cullen328 (talk) 20:54, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Editor giving vandalism warning for non-vandalism edits. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 10:04, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, please explain the reverts you made at Avianca Perú as you are giving absolutely incorrect warnings of vandalism. 106.214.81.165 (talk) 10:08, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Truly evil document (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Good block tbh - there are 4 days left til Christmas and I'm pretty bored... if you hadn't blocked me I would have carried on doing the reverts Truly evil document (talk) 20:37, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's always reassuring when a user sees good cause for their block. Cabayi (talk) 20:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]