User talk:Truth3v3r

Welcome!

Hello, Truth3v3r, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 13:54, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions for the Arab-Israeli dispute area

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 05:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop connecting to the conflict, as an excuse to censor. Please. And this organized coordinated messages do not show ethics here on wiki.Truth3v3r (talk) 19:40, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You must follow these page-specific restrictions until you have 500 edits and have been here 30 days

For the purposes of editing restrictions in the ARBPIA topic area, the "area of conflict" shall be defined as encompassing

the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted ("primary articles"), and
edits relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict, to pages and discussions in all namespaces with the exception of userspace ("related content")

Also,

500/30 Rule: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing content within the area of conflict. On primary articles, this prohibition is preferably to be enforced by use of extended confirmed protection (ECP) but this is not mandatory. On pages with related content, or on primary articles where ECP is not feasible, the 500/30 Rule may be enforced by other methods, including page protection, reverts, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters. Reverts made solely to enforce the 500/30 Rule are not considered edit warring.

The sole exceptions to this prohibition are:

1. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may use the Talk: namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Talk pages where disruption occurs may be managed by any of the methods noted in paragraph b). This exception does not apply to other internal project discussions such as AfDs, WikiProjects, RfCs, noticeboard discussions, etc.

2. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by editors who do not meet the criteria is permitted but not required.

3. One Revert Restriction (1RR): Each editor is limited to one revert per page per 24 hours on any edits made to content within the area of conflict. Reverts made to enforce the 500/30 Rule are exempt from the provisions of this motion. Also, the normal exemptions apply. Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator.

Note that this means your edits on such pages (which you aren't yet eligible to make) may be reverted by anyone at any time. These restrictions are stricter than those in most other areas because of the problems that we've had in this area. Doug Weller talk 05:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Weller's confusing subjects

I do not post on the middle east conflict. You're confusing things. Please do not politicize unrelated things to serve one particular personal opinion.Truth3v3r (talk) 11:21, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Issue # 1, coordinated attacks

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1080188550 Truth3v3r (talk) 19:45, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was right about coordination this against Wikipedia or any ethics. From the beginning. Zero0000 attacked me. Then I saw an organized coordinated attacks, trying to connect me to the so called 'Israel Palestine debate' despite making it clear I was writing about hate, not about politics.

(I have never uttered my position on that conflict which HE tried so hard to draw me in).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Truth3v3r Truth3v3r (talk) 23:36, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

March 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 18:45, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was right about Zero0000 coordination

I was right about coordination. Obviously against Wikipedia or any other forum's ethics. From the beginning, Zero0000 attacked me. Then I saw a suspicious 'organized coordinated' attacks, trying to connect me to the so-called 'Israel Palestine debate,' despite making it clear I was writing about hate, not about politics.

(I have never uttered my position on that conflict which HE tried so hard to draw me in).Truth3v3r (talk) 23:41, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What you just said is incorrect as anyone can see by reading User:Truth3v3r. Your use of your talk page is for the purpose of requesting an unblock. It is not for the purpose of criticizing other editors. Cullen328 (talk) 23:59, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter now. Zero0000 decided to censor from the get-go. I'm glad it is transparent- the coordination / organizing. I'm not asking, dud not ask to be reinstated. I was always about telling the facts. (EnPassant, Doug Weller ) Truth3v3r (talk) 18:17, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]