User talk:Truth Vindicator

Democratic party

Please read the talk page discussion and others edit summaries as you are edit warring across multiple articles. If you reinstate these changes on any article, it will be considered a violation of WP:3RR so please stop. Also we do not link to redirects which Democrat Party (US) is.Praxidicae (talk) 13:43, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Your recent editing history at Elijah Cummings shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Praxidicae (talk) 13:44, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also read this. Praxidicae (talk) 13:45, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Truth_Vindicator reported by User:Praxidicae (Result: ). Thank you. Praxidicae (talk) 13:51, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. qedk (t 愛 c) 14:03, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

-- Nick (talk) 15:29, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jay Inslee, you may be blocked from editing. -- puddleglum^2.0 13:28, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Truth Vindicator: are you itching for another block by being disruptive and not discussing things fresh off your last block? Praxidicae (talk) 13:54, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. creffett (talk) 14:01, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]