User talk:Tungilik

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Tungilik! Thank you for your contributions. I am CambridgeBayWeather and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 07:25, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New MLAs

I can't believe that none of us remembered to update the communities after the election. I think we got all the other articles relating to the election. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 07:30, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tungilik (talk) 15:05, 13 November 2013 (UTC) Was actually happy to find them, I was able to get my ten edits, so I could upload pictures. Thanks for the welcoming to Wikipedia, I am sure I will find a great community to be part of. I find this part of my progression in giving back to the open community. This year I have started with www.openstreetmap.org, making Rankin Inlet, Nu & North Battleford Sk the best I could. Oh and hope I am doing this talk thing right! haha.[reply]

You can reply to talk either on your talk page as you did or on mine. There are plenty of people who do both. Take a look at the top of the persons talk page and see if they have a preference. On the other hand if it is on an article talk page all replies are kept together. Usually the reply to a message is indented using one or more : as I did here. Also the signature would usually go at the end. But don't worry about it too much. Most people won't be too upset while you are new. Have fun. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 21:23, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CUplex (December 1)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CUplex.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FairyTailRocks (talk) 03:53, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:CUplex

Hello Tungilik!

Unfortunately, you cannot, even tough you work and have access information at the City of North Battleford because no original research says "original research used on Wikipedia to refer to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist" which means if an article has no sources it cannot be notable and hence counted as original research per General notability guideline.

Make sure that your sources must be reliable, if you want to know if a source is reliable. WP:SOURCE says "a source material must have been published, the definition of which for our purposes is made available to the public in some form. Unpublished materials are not considered reliable" You can use university-level textbooks, books published by respected publishing houses, magazines, journals and mainstream newspapers as reliable sources. Never use blogs as sources as WP:NEWSBLOG says "Never use blog posts that are left by readers as sources. For personal or group blogs that are not reliable sources."

Wikipedia strongly prefer "free" files, wherever possible. When no "free" file exist, it sometimes to ask a permission to use a non-free (copyright-protected) file under the "fair use" provision. Ideally, most free files should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons instead of Wikipedia.

In uploading images, only logged in users with autoconfirmed accounts are allowed to upload images. Now, you first find out whether the image is legal in the United States (where the Wikipedia servers are located) also, if the image has not been released (to your knowledge) under a license, and is still under copyright you must gain permission to use the image from the copyright holder. Next if you're finish, determine which image copyright tag is applicable for your file.

In the procedure of uploading it, You can upload an image by using the Upload file link on the left side of the main page under Toolbox. Use good filenames because some filenames (such as highly generic filenames produced automatically by digital cameras) are disallowed, and attempting to use them will generate an error message.

Example of good file names:

Example of bad file names:

"Image01.png"
"DSC00001.JPG"

I hope this helps in improving your article, I know it is a little bit complicated but you can ask questions at the Teahouse with more experienced editors in the wiki. Good luck! FairyTailRocks (talk) 09:51, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your article "CUPlex"

It's well written and complete but it needs a new title and references. It has a good picture though too small.

A title like "North Battleford CUPlex" would give it instant recognition when doing a search.
For references: A suggestion is to copy and paste the references from the North Battleford page.
To increase the size of your photo: view your excellent photo on the North Battleford page or a similar one, press "Edit" then copy and paste the template or line into your page, then just copy and paste the new photo file name into the template or line (after deleting the old one).

Hope this is helpful.

Good luck............Kayoty (talk)....Kayoty 08:00, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References added

Regarding your submission CUplex at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CUplex. I hope that's is okay with you that I added references and a wide angle template for the photo. I also changed the title to North Battleford CUplex. It is more precise and easier for users to find and redirect pages can be added later if needed. Your page has been resubmitted with these changes included. Keep up the good work.-- Kayoty (talk) 17:16, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CUplex concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CUplex, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CUplex concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CUplex, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CUplex

Hello Tungilik. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "CUplex".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CUplex}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 03:46, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]