User talk:Turnopoems

Hope you didn't leave...

I see you blanked the page, that's a bad sign usually. If you are still here and willing, please look at Gamal Khashaba, Mohamed Saad el Din Sherif, Aly Aly El-Moursy, Hussein Sabry Gad El Mula and add the Arabic. I don't understand the language, and you do, so if you need to change the article name, spelling, capitals, hyphens, please feel free, and thanks again!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:25, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still around for now. I'll put it on my to-do list and get on it as soon as I can. :) Turnopoems (talk) 17:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kintetsubuffalo: Done! Looks like you got most of them right (I assume you're the one who added the hidden text). Thanks for the articles. :) Turnopoems (talk) 16:13, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am, I asked a nice fellow on ar:wiki. But please correct them where you see them (you said "most of them"), and again if you need to change the article name, spelling, capitals, hyphens, please feel free!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 16:16, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did, just a minor correction. Arabic doesn't have the letter "G", but in Egyptian Arabic it replaces "J" (which in turn is informally replaced with an additional letter that doesn't exist in standard Arabic "چ"), hence Jamal becomes Gamal. The other editor spelled it with a "ک/گ" (like in Persian/Urdu/Kurdish), which I changed to the correct "ج" (jeem - i.e. geem in Egypt). Turnopoems (talk) 16:24, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did about 10 others from Morocco to Bahrain, if you want to take a look. ;) --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 16:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing, just send the links my way. My knowledge in local dialects is limited to Egypt though, so in that case standard Arabic will be my frame of reference. Turnopoems (talk) 16:44, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad el-Hibri Farid Karam Abdallah Zouaghi Mohamed Triki Mahmoud el-Alamy Abdelaziz Drissi-Kacemi Mohamed Afilal Ibrahim Zakaria Rashid Shoucair Hassan Al-Ali Mohamed H. Fhema Mostafa Salem Mohammed Saleh Al Qahtani Samih Abdel Fattah Iskandar Malek Gabr Fawzi Farghali Fathy Farghali Thanks again!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 17:00, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One more if you have time, please! Malek K. Gabr--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:13, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There we go, sorry I've been a bit swamped lately. Hope you don't mind that I added his birth-death info in the infobox. Turnopoems (talk) 12:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gebel el-Silsila

I have reverted your unexplained edits. The English works use "Gebel el-Silsila" in the professional literature. "Gabal" is a variant version used in Arabic Anglicization, which was already noted in the original article. Constructive edits are desired. Your move was not helpful in this case. This is the English Wikipedia. If certain redirect pages are needed to get to the proper English version this might be helpful. Thor Dockweiler (talk) 12:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please view my reply in the article talk page. Turnopoems (talk) 12:11, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Beer in Egypt) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Beer in Egypt, Turnopoems!

Wikipedia editor Meatsgains just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating Beer in Egypt! You should add reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

To reply, leave a comment on Meatsgains's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Excellent work on the topic of alcoholic beverages in Egypt. Keep it up! Fitzcarmalan (talk) 20:29, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Thanks for creating the new Beer in Egypt article! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:09, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another beer for you!

I loved drinking Stella Beer in Egypt! Drinking same beer in the U.S. just isn't the same.^{User talk:Level_C} 15:09, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I'm so sorry that I gave you a hard time once or twice, i.e. on Feddan. I was young and eager. Now, I definitely see that the Egypt articles should say "Feddan" where appropriate and not acres. Happy New Year! Level C (talk) 23:58, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good, cheers to you for your hard work on Egyptian articles. Happy new year! Turnopoems (talk) 11:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Youssef Khaddage

Hello! Can you provide the Arabic for Youssef Khaddage? Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:53, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you have time... Comment Suggestion

Turnopoems, if you have time, please review Terrorism and tourism in Egypt. the eloquent peasant (talk) 19:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mervat Amin

Hello, Turnopoems – I was just looking at the latest edits to Mervat Amin, and while there made a few copy-edits (which is what I mainly do on Wikipedia). I noticed that the titles in the section Mervat Amin#Partial filmography look a little odd, containing a lot of numbers in place of letters. I wonder if you would mind looking at them and see what needs to be done. Best regards, – Corinne (talk) 15:43, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Have a Happy New Year! the eloquent peasant (talk) 19:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023: Edit warring

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash (talk) 16:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your version doesn't seem to be supported by anyone other than you; you'll need to present evidence in the talk page otherwise before reverting again. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:13, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The two editors you're referring to are the ones that reversed the long-standing version, which has been in place since at least 2019 ([1]), as far back as I can go in history, and are now engaging in an edit war to force through their desired edit. Their edit was contested and instead of going to the talk page and building consensus they engaged in edit warring, I tried to pursue middle ground edits but they reversed these, going back to their desired version, and then I started the discussion on the talk page to end the constant reversals. Turnopoems (talk) 12:21, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a diff that can show your version is the "long-standing" one? OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The link I provided shows you the 2019 version and is the earliest one I can retrieve, here is the diff between that version and the current version (their desired version). This is the original edit which changed the long-standing version, an edit that was contested by me here. This resulted in the ensuing edit war by the two editors in question. At no point did they attempt to build consensus for their change but rather insisted that I pursue consensus to contest their edit in favor of the long-standing version, which already had implicit consensus by virtue of being there for at least half a decade. Turnopoems (talk) 13:14, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how that diff supports your version. If you're making a change, the onus is on you to build a consensus for that change, not them.OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I misunderstood you. You did ask me to show you that my version is the long-standing one, right? The link I provided shows that the version I'm arguing for goes back to at least 2019, which they changed now in September and I contested the change, which led to them continously reverting back to their desired change. Hence I'm not the one making a change, I'm reverting to the old, long-standing version which has had implicit consensus for years. Since their change was contested, it does not have consensus per WP:CON. Instead of seeking consensus, they simply continue to revert back to their version, regardless of any efforts I've made to reach common ground. Their constant reverting led me to start a discussion on the talk-page, to end their edit warring. Even then they continued to revert, instead of engaging properly in the discussion on the talk page. Besides reverting, all they're doing is levying allegations towards me, which leads me to believe that have no interest in actually finding a constructive outcome. Turnopoems (talk) 18:36, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ezbet El Haggana move

Hi, I saw that you created a redirect page Ezbet El Haggana to go to Madinet al-Amal. Since Haggana is the original name of the area, and more widely used, I would like your help to switch: Ezbet El Haggana becomes the main page name, and Amal is the redirect. Thanks. Ypedia1 (talk) 01:13, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Obour (city), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Operation Badr. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:27, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]