User talk:Turvill

Welcome!

Hello, Turvill, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Rklawton (talk) 21:25, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please also familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines. We take them vary seriously. If you have concerns about a biography of a living person, you should also review our biography of living persons policy. Rklawton (talk) 21:25, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the beginning of my talk page.

March 2012

Your recent editing history at Jeffrey Epstein shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 20:49, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to WP:AN3. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 21:36, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here is where it says that information sourced in an article does not have to be sourced again in the lead. Rklawton (talk) 21:39, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Your recent editing history at Jeffrey Epstein‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:31, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is amusing -- but I strongly suggest you revert it, or you will likely be blocked for "impersonating an admin"... Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:33, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! LionMans Account (talk) 04:08, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Turvill. You have new messages at Faizan's talk page.
Message added 19:38, 27 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Fai zan 19:38, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Princeton and George Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Epstein edits

You have been named in A NEW YORK TIMES STORY as a "reputation manager" that placed exaggerations of largesse in articles related to deceased child predator Jeffrey Epstein. I do not see any declaration on your user page of being a paid editor or having some other conflict of interest connection with Mr. Epstein or his foundation. Would you like to make one at this late date? Carrite (talk) 21:04, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 16:34, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]