User talk:Tyhgrewskl

Talk page :-

Welcome!

Hello, Tyhgrewskl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Rajput. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Sitush (talk) 08:27, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctions

I am not messing about going back and forth with you on various articles. I understand that you are fairly new but we work on consensus and you know from your edits that more than one person has pointed out what the consensus is regarding mentioning varna in the lead sections/infoboxes of caste articles. I suggest that you stop now - the notice below explains why. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 14:47, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As an introduction to the mess that is varna status, try this discussion. Well, you asked for it. And please note that removing the sanctions warning as you have just done amounts to acceptance of it. - Sitush (talk) 14:52, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Read that discussion. But what I can't find is consensus which you were claiming with such confidence. The discussion was started by someone and ended in complaints against you Mr. Sitush. -Tyhgrewskl (talk) 14:59, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I said that was an introduction to the mess. The consensus can be found on pretty much every caste article and is also apparent in that discussion if you appreciate that consensus is not a vote. It strikes me that you are not a new contributor, although this is a fairly new account. I will be treating you accordingly. - Sitush (talk) 15:07, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Your recent editing history at Maratha shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Sitush (talk) 14:55, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Rajput shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Sitush (talk) 15:13, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctions again

I am repeating this warning because your continued disruption is ridiculous. Please, please read it and understand it. - Sitush (talk) 15:14, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions.