User talk:UST MarCom

2

Image copyright problem with File:LinkLee hires.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:LinkLee hires.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:31, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:White Memorial.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:White Memorial.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:39, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Chapelofstbasil hires.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Chapelofstbasil hires.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cameron School of Business - University of St. Thomas (Texas) (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cameron School of Business - University of St. Thomas (Texas).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 12:56, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! UST MarCom, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, UST MarCom. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article University of St. Thomas (Texas), you may have a conflict of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 13:00, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 13:04, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UST MarCom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Basilian08 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Change username to be in line with policy UST MarCom (talk) 14:18, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Although you have been advised that this username appears appropriate, you have been advised of the future editing requirements, and asked whether or not you intend to follow them - a question you have steadfastly refused to respond to - you have stated that you understood them, but not that you will follow, even when so prompted. As the Guide to Appealing Blocks requires an unblock request to assure the community that there will be no issues with following guidelines/policies on this private website in the future, failure to respond to the most simple of questions does not give the community that sense of belief. the panda ₯’ 19:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That username is fine, but consider this:

Here are a few key questions:

Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
Do you understand conflict of interest?
Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. Daniel Case (talk) 16:18, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you for the additional clarifications. Will I receive notification when the username is changed and the account is unblocked?

Before you can be unblocked it is a requirement that you actually answer the questions, not just acknowledge them. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:12, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Each question states "Do you understand..." and I stated "Yes, thank you for the additional clarifications". So I'm not sure how else to answer them. So "Yes" ...I understand each each question/aforementioned point. Thanks

Yes, but ... what will you edit if you understand you can't edit what you came to edit? Daniel Case (talk) 16:24, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The account block was implemented due to the original username. On 13 June 2014 you stated that the new username was permissible (quote: "That username is fine"). So I'm unclear why the account still hasn't been unblocked at this point, weeks later. Any potential editing issues shouldn't have any bearing on points related to the account username not being within guidelines, correct? If the new username submitted on June 13 is "fine" as you previously stated, then the account should be unblocked. Or am I missing something? Thanks

After thoroughly reviewing this talk page it isn't clear to me where I have been "asked whether or not you intend to follow them [future editing requirements]" even once. I was asked if I understood them as listed in the bullet points presented my Mr. Case on 13 June 2014, to which I answered "Yes", twice. Thus I'm also unsure how I "have steadfastly refused to respond to that question."

If you are now asking if I intend to follow those requirements, then the answer is a resounding and respectfully submitted "Yes".

That said, I would also ask that the account be unblocked on the merits that the username as been deemed appropriate now on several occasions and was the original and only reason the account was blocked in the first place. If there are other reasons, those have not been made very clear, so I'm uncertain as to what further recourse can be taken on my end at this point. Thanks

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cameron School of Business - University of St. Thomas (Texas) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cameron School of Business - University of St. Thomas (Texas), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cameron School of Business - University of St. Thomas (Texas) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cameron School of Business - University of St. Thomas (Texas), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cameron School of Business - University of St. Thomas (Texas)

Hello, UST MarCom. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Cameron School of Business - University of St. Thomas (Texas)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:00, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]