User talk:Urali gounder Tn45

February 2022

Hello. Your recent edit to Urali Gounder appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Urali Gounder, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The people listed as notable people were wrong Urali gounder Tn45 (talk) 13:23, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Urali Gounder. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:26, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just deleted wrong content

Deleted wrong content Urali gounder Tn45 (talk) 13:28, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Urali gounder Tn45. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:04, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]