User talk:Uranium grenade

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Burj Dubai and its height on BurjDubai.com[edit]

Uranium grenade, I see what you are referring to. But, if Emaar was ready to announce a new height of the Burj Dubai they would change it under the "Construction Statistics" section on their website. I am sure they want the publicity and would change it as soon as possible. Also, the say "tallest structure in the world." That sentence is very ambiguous. We do not know if they are only referring to free-standing structures or to all man-made structures in the world. I think it is best to wait until they announce a new height for the Burj Dubai or make an official statement. Thank you discussing this instead of starting an edit war. Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 21:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

No, I do not think we should add it. Like I said above, we should wait until we have an official statement with an exact height. If you still think we should add it, you should discuss it at Talk:Burj Dubai where more people will be able to discuss it. Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 20:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Button sig.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:31, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Cristiano Ronaldo appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. If you believe your edit(s) did contribute positively to the article, please start a discussion on the article's talk page and notify me so I can improve my anti-vandal efforts by learning from my mistakes in order to make less in future. George D. Watson (Dendodge).TalkHelp 00:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Button sig.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:17, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Indefinitely blocked[edit]

I have indefinitely blocked this account. Tom Harrison Talk 17:05, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I mistook your edits for vandalism. I've unblocked. Sorry for any inconvenience. Tom Harrison Talk 17:19, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Yes check.svg

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock has been cleared, so you should be able to edit. Sorry for this.

Request handled by: Hersfold (t/a/c) 17:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Try now. Tom Harrison Talk 17:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

RZA is a philosopher[edit]

Considering the fact that he wrote The Wu-Tang manual, should he be categorized under American philosophers??? The book is based on philosophy, so should'nt he listed as one, just like Bruce Lee? (LonerXL (talk) 00:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC))

RZA may soon move forward as philosopher, considering the fact that he is currently working in a second Wu-tang Manual. Even 50 cent is writing a book with Robert Greene - "The 50th Law." Have you noticed that more rappers are writing philosophical boooks now? It's possible that they may soon be within the ranks of modern day philosophers. I clearly understand your point of view. However, you are looking at past philosophers, while I am looking at the current, modern day philosophers. I believe you may soon find yourself listing certain rappers and philosophers in the same wiki categories. Bruce Lee was considered as a philosopher first and martial artist second. Nice discussion we had here, even though we have a disagreement. Please enjoy your weekend and be safe.(LonerXL (talk) 17:21, 25 June 2009 (UTC))

Nomination of Kirisute Gomen for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kirisute Gomen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirisute Gomen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:55, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Uranium grenade. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)