User talk:Vamend

This is Vamend's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gian Berto Vanni (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gian Berto Vanni and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gian Berto Vanni, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:19, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vamend! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 12:19, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gian Berto Vanni (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HickoryOughtShirt?4 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gian Berto Vanni and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gian Berto Vanni, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 00:32, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gian Berto Vanni

Congratulations on Gian Berto Vanni: yes, it's an article now.

I have to say that I'm still puzzled by what you describe as an MA thesis. In terms of bulk, etc, it looks a lot more like a PhD thesis. But actually it looks less like a PhD thesis than a book.

You deleted a comment of mine, I suppose because you thought it was obsolete. If a signed comment (even your own) seems obsolete or otherwise unnecessary, please don't remove it. (An exception is the process by which a draft becomes an article: all comments on the draft are automatically removed.) Of course, you're free to respond, pointing out that the comment is obsolete or mistaken.

I'm sorry that promotion to article status took so long, but I hope that you weren't/aren't discouraged by the delay. Happy editing!-- Hoary (talk) 07:01, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, Hoary! I was not discouraged at all, it was an opportunity to learn new things and to appreciate the effort of you all here on Wikipedia. I truly believe in quality over anything, so your suggestions were helpful and totally on point. Sorry I deleted your comment; I am afraid I am still not used to comment/thread here. I am going to learn this too! Thank you again for your help. Keep up the good work! Vamend (talk) 13:31, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]