User talk:VaniusTV

March 2023

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. JBW (talk) 22:00, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mark Forster (singer), you may be blocked from editing. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:34, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Liverwurst. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:35, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luke Schäfer (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SamHolt6 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This is the English language Wikipedia; we can only accept articles written in the English language. Please provide a high-quality English language translation of your submission. Have you visited the Wikipedia home page? You can probably find a version of Wikipedia in your language.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Declining; draft is in German, and English Wikipedia requires submissions be in English. Also does not meet WP:NBIO criteria for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luke Schäfer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 00:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VaniusTV! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SamHolt6 (talk) 00:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Hello, and welcome to editing Wikipedia. I hope you have a successful time here. However, there's a point about links in articles which it will be helpful for you to know. Generally speaking an article should have a link to another article (known as a "Wikilink") only in one of the following situations. Firstly, if the link goes to a page which has further information on the subject of the article containing the link. Secondly, if the link goes to an article which provides an explanation of a term which is used in the linking article and for which readers are likely to need an explanation. It is a common mistake among new editors to add links for words which appear in an article but which don't need explanation. For example, nobody reading the article Rarbach is likely to need to look up what "river" means in order to understand that article, nor does the article river provide any further information about the Rarbach. Such unnecessary wikilinks are not just no helpful, they can actually be harmful, because research has established that the more unhelpful links an article contains, the less likely readers are to find the helpful ones. JBW (talk) 08:14, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Luke Schäfer

Hello, VaniusTV. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Luke Schäfer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Luke Schäfer

Hello, VaniusTV. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Luke Schäfer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 02:23, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]