User talk:Vctm64
Welcome!
[edit]
|
January 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Keira High School, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 14:34, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Userpages
[edit]Hello, I sympathize and respect what you are saying on these pages, but this is an encyclopedia. Can you please remove the content on User:Vctm64 and User:Vctm64/Keira boys high. It has no place here. You may want to read wp:userpage Thank you. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 14:41, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
deletion of legitimate contributions
[edit]If past students cannot record our memories - good and bad then how can this be a source of information about the school?
That my contribution as a past student was edited without discussion or any request for sources or verification is of great concern. Sadly the molestion of boys was part of the school's history, as was the subsequent building of self esteeem.
eg the formation of the Interact Club in 1967 is a matter of record. the debating competition was in the Illawarra Daily Mercury
Please list the kinds of sources you accept.
a statement made to the Police?
a letter of demand for compensation from the school authorities?
surely the number of ex students to make referance to sexual abuse by teachers demonstrates that there was sexual abuse in the school prior to 1967.
it needs to be acknowledged so that old boys can make progress in our healing.
otherwise its just more denial more cover ups
I beg you to include our contributions which I am sure other past students will in time also verify
- I suggest reading about verifability and reliable sources. Negative and controversial content SHOULD be deleted without proper verification. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 15:42, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- My last attempt - this isn't very complicated. I am in no way doubting anything YOU say. However, Wikipedia requires reliable sources to verify. Also, please remove the content from User:Vctm64 and User:Vctm64/Keira boys high per Wikipedia:UP#NOT. Thank you. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 03:38, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Keira High School. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 14:29, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Vctm64
[edit]User:Vctm64, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Vctm64 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Vctm64 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 14:35, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Vctm64/Keira boys high
[edit]User:Vctm64/Keira boys high, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Vctm64/Keira boys high and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Vctm64/Keira boys high during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 14:37, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Another tool
[edit]Due to policies on verifiability, notability, and no original research, (click the links for details on each policy) you may find that Wikipedia is not the medium through which you will accomplish your objectives. You might consider writing a google sidewiki entry on the Wikipedia article, or blogging about it. ...but what do you think? ~BFizz 05:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:49, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
supporting documentation allegations of sexual abuse
[edit]Allegations that certain teachers sexually abused boys ought to be read in the context of http://www.mako.org.au/frank_arkell.html and HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES INNOVATION AND EDUCATION LEGISLATION ... I went to one school that absolutely shocked me. I went to Wollongong High School and next door to it, in my day, was Keira Boys High School, which ... parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/genpdf/chamber/...06.../hansard_frag.pdf;...
my google search has several references to Parliamentary Documentation
I will continue to search for further supporting evidence.
submissions to the Wood Royal Commission by any victim of sexual abuse at KBHS may have been marked confidential for fear of reprisal. (Vctm64 (talk) 14:23, 23 January 2010 (UTC))